Fashion, Beauty, Entertainment, Cars, Celebrities > Cars & Autos > Toyota > OT Resolved Democrats are Pro Saddam
OT Resolved Democrats are Pro Saddam
Posted by Scott in Fla


Anti War in Iraq = Pro Saddam

case closed <g>


Scott in Florida

Posted by Sharxster



"Scott in Fla" <NotNow@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:doigpvsdla4nb973gq57seiutra6g6gmtr@4ax.com...
Precisely.



Posted by Roy Blankenship



"Scott in Fla" <NotNow@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:doigpvsdla4nb973gq57seiutra6g6gmtr@4ax.com...
Why don't you go to a REAL political newsgroup so that you can get your
clock cleaned by people who can actually think?



Posted by MDT Tech®


Roy Blankenship wrote:

--




Terrorist, kill them, its cheaper than trying to get them to like you!


Posted by Kai Seymour


Scott in Fla wrote:

Troll = In-bred moron

1) No Toyota aspect to your post unless you're relying on the fact that
whenever you find pictures of the third world, no one drives a Ford;
invariably they are in Yota's. Given the rudimentary maintenance
availability in primitive countries, this is a strong endorsement for
the brand.

2) Why are we in Iraq? Oh, that's right...we are there to ensure that
the Iraqi people are afforded the freedom of political debate, (since
the whole nuclear weapons thing has proved to be a fraud), which "Scott
in Florida" (& "Sharxster") vigorously deny their fellow American
citizens. 70 years ago they would have marched for Adolf, or Stalin, or
Mao, or whomever else they needed to do their thinking for them. Have
pity on them while they wait for their Ditthead-in-Chief to get out of
rehab.

3) Given how badly your state's obviously retarded and/or senile
electorate has fucked up its elections, both federal & state, in the
last two years, the best way to hurt Castro is by returning everything
south of Georgia, back to Cuba.


Posted by Scott in Fla


On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 06:01:47 GMT, Kai Seymour <kaiwuds@yahooo.com>
wrote:

<snip liberal junk>

LOL

The problem with my state is the Demoncrats. They can't read/write/
or punch a ballot.

Those of us who are Republican conservatives can read/write and have
NO problem voting.

The counties that had problems voting were....you guessed it...run by
Demoncrats.

case closed...



Scott in Florida

Posted by Roy Blankenship



"Scott in Fla" <NotNow@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:n4ttpvgffqso1pm8rb3ejrah8c5glgp41t@4ax.com...
Your utterly simplistic answers don't even come close to addressing the
issue, but hey, who needs facts when you are a fucking dumbass to start
with? Do you even have the power to comprehend what went wrong in the 2000
election? You have had 3 years to think about it, that should be enough
time.



Posted by Sharxster



"Roy Blankenship" <biasbro@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:Qbmpb.24228$oJ3.11993@newssvr31.news.prodigy. com...
Get over it. Bush won. Your ilk lost.




Posted by Scott in Fla


On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 06:02:24 GMT, "Roy Blankenship"
<biasbro@prodigy.net> wrote:

Let's see 'fucking dumbass". Not really sure what that is. Please
explain...

Absolutely nothing went wrong with the 2000 election. The best man
won...fair and square.

I have and agree with the electorate in 2000. We chose the best man!


Scott in Florida

Posted by MDT Tech®


Roy Blankenship wrote:
What problems, chads? We have been using this system for years, funny
its only an issue when the dumbocrats lose, they tried it (to steal an
election) in California too, this wasn't the first time. Why did they
only want a recount is 3 counties? Because those 3 were demonrat
strongholds, what about the other 50 some ot counties? I couldn't
believe we were talking about a "dimpled chad", assuming they knew who
the voter was thinking about voting or not voting for. How many in here
have actually been unable to punch a chad out, I mean, talk about weak,
if its dimpled they changed their mind, not because they didn't have
enough strength to push the pin through. Actually, you have had 3 years
to think about it! Why don't you get your party in order before they
lose it all, oh, never mind, they already did.


--








SENATOR ZELL MILLER DEMOCRAT OF GEORGIA, the nation's most prominent
conservative Democrat, said today he will endorse President Bush for
re-election in 2004 and campaign for him if Bush wishes him to. Miller
said Bush is "the right man at the right time" to govern the country.

The next five years "will determine the kind of world my children and
grandchildren will live in," Miller said in an interview. And he
wouldn't "trust" any of the nine Democratic presidential candidates with
governing during "that crucial period," he said. "This Democrat will
vote for President Bush in 2004."


Posted by MDT Tech®


Scott in Fla wrote:
Scott,its just sour grapes. They're getting mad, they have been out of
control since 1994, after 40 years of owning Washington, its tought to
be the "minority party", the old dinosaur is about extinct. Their
answer, move further to the left! I like that, we can use a wider
margin, 3 democrat senators are going to retire, not seek re-election,
so these will be up for grabs, this should give the GOP a bigger grip on
the senate.

Democrats, suck it up, swallow those sour grapes and move on!

--








SENATOR ZELL MILLER DEMOCRAT OF GEORGIA, the nation's most prominent
conservative Democrat, said today he will endorse President Bush for
re-election in 2004 and campaign for him if Bush wishes him to. Miller
said Bush is "the right man at the right time" to govern the country.

The next five years "will determine the kind of world my children and
grandchildren will live in," Miller said in an interview. And he
wouldn't "trust" any of the nine Democratic presidential candidates with
governing during "that crucial period," he said. "This Democrat will
vote for President Bush in 2004."


Posted by noyb


Why the arguments over republicans & democrats.

It makes no sense.

They both rake us over the coals.

They're in cahoots.

You know the old game, good cops & bad cops.



Posted by Sharxster



<noyb> wrote in message news:m1cnqvge7ptfvbp5pa8hptaccllhn7df8g@4ax.com...
Yeah, but undesirable demographics tend to vote Dumbocrat.



Posted by Scott in Fla


On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 00:47:53 GMT, "Sharxster"
<sharxster1@thesharxmanor1.com> wrote:

....when they can figure out how to punch out a chad <g>


Scott in Florida

Posted by MDT Tech®


noyb wrote:


--








SENATOR ZELL MILLER DEMOCRAT OF GEORGIA, the nation's most prominent
conservative Democrat, said today he will endorse President Bush for
re-election in 2004 and campaign for him if Bush wishes him to. Miller
said Bush is "the right man at the right time" to govern the country.

The next five years "will determine the kind of world my children and
grandchildren will live in," Miller said in an interview. And he
wouldn't "trust" any of the nine Democratic presidential candidates with
governing during "that crucial period," he said. "This Democrat will
vote for President Bush in 2004."



Similar Posts