On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 19:34:46 GMT, Another Tom <sg7188@snet.net> wrote:

so we just discard all your chads...


Scott in Florida

On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 20:00:59 +0000, Scott in Florida wrote:

Apparenly someone did; looking at the vote totals I wouldn't exactly call
W's election "a mandate from the people"

Steve wrote:
Sap! You are full of shit. Go back to school and finish your Grade 6.

Patriot wrote:
That would make YOU a terrified tiny infant.

"Charks" <Charks@Charkstank.com> wrote in message
news:qNdVb.9693$Qa3.3879@edtnps89...

The one constant here is that when you get them bushlovers going with common
sense points you get back a child's response.

Patriot

On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 19:21:58 GMT, Another Tom <sg7188@snet.net> wrote:

cannot remember that we gave the Iranian hostage-takers weapons.
Somehow I have to believe if he is the best president the Republicans
have to talk about, they are really in trouble. Regan broke the law
and never paid for it, his flunkies took the rap.

Posted by Rubber Dinosuarus

Steve wrote: Why are right
Steve, get off welfare, the dependency upon democrats is killing you. I
suppose we could bomb an aspirin factory, kill its janotir to detract
from the Monical Lewinski ordeal and call it "war on terror". ;D Steve,
your foaming at the mouth. Arent you a member of the kind caring and
compassionate party? Arent you suppose to be inclusinve, able to accept
differering points of veiw? Your rabid response sais othewrwise.

Steve wrote:
No, he was spreading seed instead.

Another Tom wrote:

A win is a win. Suck it up Tom.

Subject: hypocrisy history

The way it looks, this is the guy that's going to be challenging
President Bush. Just when I thought the country was putting the
lying, cheating, corrupt years of the Defendant-In-Chief behind
us, another democrat comes along and, from all appearances, looks
like he can give William Jefferson Clinton a run for his money in
the hypocrisy department.

Can young guys even imagine if a republican would do some of this
stuff. Thanks once again to Brit Hume and the Grapevine. You'd
never hear this stuff if it were up to the other networks.

Bushy

Quinn's 1st Law: Liberalism always generates the exact opposite
of it's stated intent.

Now and Then

Howard Dean has criticized John Kerry for voting to authorize war
with Iraq last year, after voting against the first Gulf War in
1991.

There's more to it than that.

Kerry sent a letter to a constituent back in 1991, saying --
"Thank you for contacting me to express your opposition ... to
the early use of military force by the U.S. against Iraq. I share
your concerns. On January 11, I voted ... against a resolution
giving the president the immediate authority to go to war."

Nine days later, the same constituent received another letter
from Kerry, saying -- "Thank you for contacting me to express
your support for the actions of President Bush [in the Persian
Gulf]... From the outset of the invasion, I have strongly and
unequivocally supported President Bush's response to the crisis."

The Leading Facts

Democratic frontrunner, John Kerry has said that he, "led the
fight" for deficit reduction in 1985. And more recently, "led the
fight" against President Bush's Medicare prescription drug bill.

But according to the University of Pennsylvania's Annenberg
Public Policy Center, the measure to launch the balanced budget
was drafted by two Republicans and Kerry was not the first to
back it in 1985.

And The Washington Post said three months ago that it was Sen.
Ted Kennedy who, "led the fight" against President Bush's
prescription drug bill.

Hasn't Made Up His Mind

While Democrats are busy raising questions of President Bush's
military service, John Kerry -- who has made his Vietnam service
a centerpiece of his campaign -- says he hasn't made up his mind
whether to do the same.

But in 1992, Kerry went to the Senate floor to defend Bill
Clinton -- who was being accused of dodging the Vietnam draft.
Kerry called Clinton's critics -- "latter-day Spiro Agnews ...
[who were playing] to the worst instincts of divisiveness and
reaction," adding -- "the race for the White House should be
about leadership and leadership requires that one help heal the
wounds of Vietnam, not reopen them."

A Little Help from My ...

John Kerry -- who has cast himself as a lifelong fighter against
special interests -- helped an insurance company be able to
profit from investing federal dollars.

In 2000, he blocked legislation that would have stopped American
International Group -- or AIG -- from investing millions of
dollars it was overpaid in insurance for a major construction
project in Boston.

Kerry says he didn't do it for the company, he did it for his
constituents -- who needed the project finished. But the AP says
Kerry accepted $48,000 worth of donations to his senate and
presidential campaigns from AIG and its executives.

On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 12:47:43 -0500, MajorDomo@mailcity.com wrote:

....and you are surprised??

The walking cadaver should be fun after the press starts up on him.
He is a piece of 'inside the Beltway' scum.

A gigolo...

....and a member of the Vietnam Veterans Against The War...

That is a communist group.

should be fun...


Scott in Florida

Scott in Florida <NotInThisLifetime@nope.ucan't> wrote in message news:<6d2620t33tkjedh32rars7lbofhhktpq46@4ax.com>. ..
Ironically Rumsfeld was Saddam's biggest buddy when we knew he had
weapons of mass destruction and was using them on Iran. Now that he
has no WMD's he is our mortal enemy.

Arthur Begun wrote:
That was then. This is now. Alliances chance. Study some history, already!

"Scott in Florida" <NotInThisLifetime@nope.ucan't> wrote in message
news:7ss520dmq5kp2pbcsihaaf8mratjsssmgi@4ax.com...
I thought the War was over.

On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:02:12 -0500, "Tha Ghee" <grewatson@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Well you were wrong...as always.

We are AT war with terrorists around the world.


Scott in Florida

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:33:53 GMT, Scott in Florida
<NotInThisLifetime@nope.ucan't> wrote:

Why hasn't Bush invaded Syria?

He is leaving us at risk of being destroyed by WMD by refusing to
invade Syria. That MUST be where the WMD are at.

Bush is wimping out by not immediately pursuing those weapons and the
evildoers who now have them. And we know Syria is chock full of
terrorists.

The only reason Bush isn't invading is because he's putting domestic
politics ahead of YOUR safety and the security of our nation.

Here's what David Kay had to say:


"There is ample evidence of movement to Syria before the war --
satellite photographs, reports on the ground of a constant stream of
trucks, cars, rail traffic across the border. We simply don't know
what was moved," Kay said.

We must act now and keep invading countries until we find the WMD! If
Bush refuses to pursue these dangerous weapons and the evildoers, real
Americans must vote him out of office!

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:42:56 -0600, will
<will@quincycarterbandwagon.com> wrote:

We are getting ready to go into Syria. You willing to go over and
help our troops?

I thought not...


Scott in Florida

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:57:26 GMT, Scott in Florida
<NotInThisLifetime@nope.ucan't> wrote:


I am currently monitoring the threat level here and monitoring my
neighborhood for Islamists. If you are interested in purchasing a
Homeland Security kit from me, please email. A large roll of duct tape
and plastic sheeting is $99.99 including shipping.

We know the WMD and the terrorists are in Syria. We must get them
immediately. Leaving them alone this long has already been an
unacceptable risk.

Charks wrote:

century, particularly with regard to the Third World & Middle East have
been due to our uncanny ability to back lousy govt's for short term
goals, and then having to spend thousands of lives to clean up the mess
a decade or three later.

will wrote:
Clinton doing nothing after they tried to knock down the WTC was an
unacceptable risk. If Syria is found building WMD intended for US
targets, they will get theirs. I know there was no WMD is the Sudan
aspirin factory either.