Fashion, Beauty, Entertainment, Cars, Celebrities > Health & Fitness > HIV / Aids > US Women and 'HIV/AIDS'
US Women and 'HIV/AIDS'
Posted by PaulKing



Less than one in a million

Caucasian heterosexual women (even including I..V. drugs users) represent
an 'AIDS' risk of only about ONE IN A MILLION or less. In California last
year there were only 79 cases.

HIV Testing Among Racial/Ethnic Minorities --- United States, 1999

Of the 774,467 AIDS cases reported to CDC during June 1981--December 2000
(2), blacks and Hispanics accounted for 56% of cases, although they
represented 25% of the U.S. population during this period. In 2000, the
incidence of adult and adolescent AIDS cases per 100,000 population was
74.2 for blacks, 30.4 for Hispanics, and 7.9 for whites.

Of the 7.9% Caucasian cases only about 7% are said to be from
heterosexual
activity. (Source: - CDC)
That translates to 0.55 per 100,000 or: -
JUST ONE AIDS CASE IN EVERY 200,000 Caucasian heterosexuals.

Hardly a spectacular figure.Lightning deaths in America kill 75 to 100
people a year.

BUT WOMEN ARE ONLY A TINY PERCENTAGE OF THAT VERY SMALL FIGURE

Caucasian heterosexual women (even including I..V. drugs users) represent
an 'AIDS' risk of only about ONE IN A MILLION or less. In California last
year there were only 79 cases.

IN REAL TERMS A ZERO RISK!

These figures beg the question is 'AIDS' caused by an std or by poverty.
Could African American and Hispanic women really be having so much more
sex? A graph of 'AIDS' fits perfectly with a graph of poverty in America
but in no way reflects sexual activity.


Posted by PaulKing


STRAIGHT AIDS MYTH SHATTERED
New York Post
March 19, 2004 --

THE public health experts - and their amen corner in the media - owe Helen
Gurley Brown an apology.

The legendary Cosmopolitan editor was vilified in 1993 when she published
a piece called "The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS." But she was right.
Eleven years later, Details is asking: "Whatever Happened to AIDS and
Straight Men?" The article states, "A disease-free man who has unprotected
sex with a drug-free woman stands a one in 5 million chance of contracting
HIV."

The story by Kevin Gray also cites a joke that made the rounds of the New
York City Department of Health as statistics came in showing that the
predicted spread of AIDS to heterosexuals wasn't happening:
"What do you call a man who got HIV from his girlfriend? . . . A liar."

"I feel somewhat vindicated," Brown told PAGE SIX.
Michael Fumento, who wrote the original 1990 book titled "The Myth of
Heterosexual AIDS," said, "I'm not waiting for an apology. It's not going
to happen."
When Basic Books published Fumento's tome, "Distributors refused to handle
it," he says. "Stores refused to carry it. And at many stores that did
have it, clerks left it in the basement."

Celia Farber, who wrote an AIDS column in Spin magazine, was routinely
attacked because she refused to rehash the propaganda put out by AmFAR and
other groups.

"Everybody who was wrong got journalism awards. Everybody who was right
got all but driven from the profession," Farber said.

Farber exposed the conspiracy between profit-hungry drug companies,
researchers who wanted more funding, homosexuals who didn't want the
disease to be known as "the gay plague," and conservatives who wanted to
turn back the sexual revolution.
"They believed in what they were doing, not what they were saying,"
Fumento said. "They knew it was lies. They felt the end justified the
means."

At a recent editorial meeting at Seed, the new science magazine, Pulitzer
Prize-winning reporter Laurie Garrett supposedly threatened to quit when a
colleague suggested a story about Peter Duesberg, a leading
retrovirologist.

Duesberg lost his funding, his laboratory, and his students when he
announced in 1987 that HIV doesn't cause AIDS. "He lost everything," said
one


Similar Posts