- STRAIGHT AIDS MYTH SHATTERED - New York Post
- Posted by PaulKing
STRAIGHT AIDS MYTH SHATTERED - New York Post
March 19, 2004
THE public health experts - and their amen corner in the media - owe Helen
Gurley Brown an apology.
The legendary Cosmopolitan editor was vilified in 1993 when she published
a piece called "The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS." But she was right.
Eleven years later, Details is asking: "Whatever Happened to AIDS and
Straight Men?" The article states, "A disease-free man who has unprotected
sex with a drug-free woman stands a one in 5 million chance of contracting
HIV."
The story by Kevin Gray also cites a joke that made the rounds of the New
York City Department of Health as statistics came in showing that the
predicted spread of AIDS to heterosexuals wasn't happening:
"What do you call a man who got HIV from his girlfriend? . . . A liar." "I
feel somewhat vindicated," Brown told PAGE SIX.
Michael Fumento, who wrote the original 1990 book titled "The Myth of
Heterosexual AIDS," said, "I'm not waiting for an apology. It's not going
to happen."
When Basic Books published Fumento's tome, "Distributors refused to handle
it," he says. "Stores refused to carry it. And at many stores that did
have it, clerks left it in the basement."
Celia Farber, who wrote an AIDS column in Spin magazine, was routinely
attacked because she refused to rehash the propaganda put out by AmFAR and
other groups.
"Everybody who was wrong got journalism awards. Everybody who was right
got all but driven from the profession," Farber said.
Farber exposed the conspiracy between profit-hungry drug companies,
researchers who wanted more funding, homosexuals who didn't want the
disease to be known as "the gay plague," and conservatives who wanted to
turn back the sexual revolution. "They believed in what they were doing,
not what they were saying," Fumento said. "They knew it was lies. They
felt the end justified the means."
At a recent editorial meeting at Seed, the new science magazine, Pulitzer
Prize-winning reporter Laurie Garrett supposedly threatened to quit when a
colleague suggested a story about Peter Duesberg, a leading
retrovirologist.
Duesberg lost his funding, his laboratory, and his students when he
announced in 1987 that HIV doesn't cause AIDS. "He lost everything," said
one insider. Duesberg switched to cancer research, and is now touted to
win a Nobel Prize.
- Posted by Uiopp
In article
<435703c3ee378aab09ade6900f362bc7@localhost.talkab outhealthnetwork.com>,
"PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote:
Who by?
- Posted by PaulKing
STRAIGHT AIDS MYTH SHATTERED - New York Post
New York Post
March 19, 2004
THE public health experts - and their amen corner in the media - owe Helen
Gurley Brown an apology.
The legendary Cosmopolitan editor was vilified in 1993 when she published
a piece called "The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS." But she was right.
Eleven years later, Details is asking: "Whatever Happened to AIDS and
Straight Men?" The article states, "A disease-free man who has unprotected
sex with a drug-free woman stands a one in 5 million chance of contracting
HIV."
The story by Kevin Gray also cites a joke that made the rounds of the New
York City Department of Health as statistics came in showing that the
predicted spread of AIDS to heterosexuals wasn't happening:
"What do you call a man who got HIV from his girlfriend? . . . A liar." "I
feel somewhat vindicated," Brown told PAGE SIX.
Michael Fumento, who wrote the original 1990 book titled "The Myth of
Heterosexual AIDS," said, "I'm not waiting for an apology. It's not going
to happen."
When Basic Books published Fumento's tome, "Distributors refused to handle
it," he says. "Stores refused to carry it. And at many stores that did
have it, clerks left it in the basement."
Celia Farber, who wrote an AIDS column in Spin magazine, was routinely
attacked because she refused to rehash the propaganda put out by AmFAR and
other groups.
"Everybody who was wrong got journalism awards. Everybody who was right
got all but driven from the profession," Farber said.
Farber exposed the conspiracy between profit-hungry drug companies,
researchers who wanted more funding, homosexuals who didn't want the
disease to be known as "the gay plague," and conservatives who wanted to
turn back the sexual revolution. "They believed in what they were doing,
not what they were saying," Fumento said. "They knew it was lies. They
felt the end justified the means."
At a recent editorial meeting at Seed, the new science magazine, Pulitzer
Prize-winning reporter Laurie Garrett supposedly threatened to quit when a
colleague suggested a story about Peter Duesberg, a leading
retrovirologist.
Duesberg lost his funding, his laboratory, and his students when he
announced in 1987 that HIV doesn't cause AIDS. "He lost everything," said
one insider. Duesberg switched to cancer research, and is now touted to
win a Nobel Prize.
- Posted by PaulKing
STRAIGHT AIDS MYTH SHATTERED - New York Post
New York Post
March 19, 2004
THE public health experts - and their amen corner in the media - owe Helen
Gurley Brown an apology.
The legendary Cosmopolitan editor was vilified in 1993 when she published
a piece called "The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS." But she was right.
Eleven years later, Details is asking: "Whatever Happened to AIDS and
Straight Men?" The article states, "A disease-free man who has unprotected
sex with a drug-free woman stands a one in 5 million chance of contracting
HIV."
The story by Kevin Gray also cites a joke that made the rounds of the New
York City Department of Health as statistics came in showing that the
predicted spread of AIDS to heterosexuals wasn't happening:
"What do you call a man who got HIV from his girlfriend? . . . A liar." "I
feel somewhat vindicated," Brown told PAGE SIX.
Michael Fumento, who wrote the original 1990 book titled "The Myth of
Heterosexual AIDS," said, "I'm not waiting for an apology. It's not going
to happen."
When Basic Books published Fumento's tome, "Distributors refused to handle
it," he says. "Stores refused to carry it. And at many stores that did
have it, clerks left it in the basement."
Celia Farber, who wrote an AIDS column in Spin magazine, was routinely
attacked because she refused to rehash the propaganda put out by AmFAR and
other groups.
"Everybody who was wrong got journalism awards. Everybody who was right
got all but driven from the profession," Farber said.
Farber exposed the conspiracy between profit-hungry drug companies,
researchers who wanted more funding, homosexuals who didn't want the
disease to be known as "the gay plague," and conservatives who wanted to
turn back the sexual revolution. "They believed in what they were doing,
not what they were saying," Fumento said. "They knew it was lies. They
felt the end justified the means."
At a recent editorial meeting at Seed, the new science magazine, Pulitzer
Prize-winning reporter Laurie Garrett supposedly threatened to quit when a
colleague suggested a story about Peter Duesberg, a leading
retrovirologist.
Duesberg lost his funding, his laboratory, and his students when he
announced in 1987 that HIV doesn't cause AIDS. "He lost everything," said
one insider. Duesberg switched to cancer research, and is now touted to
win a Nobel Prize.
- Posted by GMCarter
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 03:19:07 -0500, "PaulKing"
<aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote:
More nonsense. Maybe if you are white, heterosexual and limit the
number of partners you will have little chance of acquiring HIV.
If you work for Mark as an actor, you may wind up infected while he
profits on your low-paid bad acting!
George M. Carter
- Posted by PaulKing
What are you raving about now? You are getting more insane by the day.
- Posted by PaulKing
STRAIGHT AIDS MYTH SHATTERED - New York Post
New York Post
March 19, 2004
THE public health experts - and their amen corner in the media - owe Helen
Gurley Brown an apology.
The legendary Cosmopolitan editor was vilified in 1993 when she published
a piece called "The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS." But she was right.
Eleven years later, Details is asking: "Whatever Happened to AIDS and
Straight Men?" The article states, "A disease-free man who has unprotected
sex with a drug-free woman stands a one in 5 million chance of contracting
HIV."
The story by Kevin Gray also cites a joke that made the rounds of the New
York City Department of Health as statistics came in showing that the
predicted spread of AIDS to heterosexuals wasn't happening:
"What do you call a man who got HIV from his girlfriend? . . . A liar." "I
feel somewhat vindicated," Brown told PAGE SIX.
Michael Fumento, who wrote the original 1990 book titled "The Myth of
Heterosexual AIDS," said, "I'm not waiting for an apology. It's not going
to happen."
When Basic Books published Fumento's tome, "Distributors refused to handle
it," he says. "Stores refused to carry it. And at many stores that did
have it, clerks left it in the basement."
Celia Farber, who wrote an AIDS column in Spin magazine, was routinely
attacked because she refused to rehash the propaganda put out by AmFAR and
other groups.
"Everybody who was wrong got journalism awards. Everybody who was right
got all but driven from the profession," Farber said.
Farber exposed the conspiracy between profit-hungry drug companies,
researchers who wanted more funding, homosexuals who didn't want the
disease to be known as "the gay plague," and conservatives who wanted to
turn back the sexual revolution. "They believed in what they were doing,
not what they were saying," Fumento said. "They knew it was lies. They
felt the end justified the means."
At a recent editorial meeting at Seed, the new science magazine, Pulitzer
Prize-winning reporter Laurie Garrett supposedly threatened to quit when a
colleague suggested a story about Peter Duesberg, a leading
retrovirologist.
Duesberg lost his funding, his laboratory, and his students when he
announced in 1987 that HIV doesn't cause AIDS. "He lost everything," said
one insider. Duesberg switched to cancer research, and is now touted to
win a Nobel Prize.
