Pfrod Show likes to go around squealing that people on this list are
in the pay of pharma. Pfrod is deranged.

However, that's not to say that OTHERS aren't in the pay of pharma and
that there aren't conflicts of interest that are extremely lucrative.

It is indeed a serious problem. Frod, unfortunatley, points the stick
in the wrong direction.

George M. Carter

***
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/stor...082E3A06866%7D

NIH scientist charged with Pfizer conflict of interest

PrintDisable live quotesRSSDigg itDel.icio.usBy Gabriel Madway
Last Update: 2:15 PM ET Dec 4, 2006


SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- Federal prosecutors on Monday charged a
National Institutes of Health scientist with engaging in a criminal
conflict of interest by earning private consulting fees from Pfizer
Inc., according to media reports. Dr. Trey Sunderland was accused of
performing consulting work for the pharmaceutical giant that
improperly
overlapped with his government duties, the Associated Press reported.
Court papers say Sunderland did not get proper approval from the
government for his consulting work and did not properly report
$285,000
in consulting fees and travel money from Pfizer, the report said. The
conflict of interest charge carries a maximum of one year in prison
and
a $100,000 fine, the AP said.

********

"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message
LOL, what is more scary are the charges.
They stem from the fact he did not have grub-ment permission
and he didn't pay the proper kick-back to the grub-ment.

"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:aanan2lv6cki8pngnp5fi454jioch5io72@4ax.com...
George Mary is obviously suffering from a nervous breakdown
with paranoid Pfeatures, arising not only from his own
pharma greed and sleazy past, but also the significant
thumping he got at the hands of Quackwatch.

On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 11:13:38 -0500, "Life" <Life@life.com> wrote:

Pharma greed? You make that claim. It is wholly unsupported.

Arkopharma? They subsidized PART of a trip; not the whole thing. I
went with two colleagues, wrote a report and noted that. And despite
you efforts, I'm not ashamed nor concerned by that--an event that
occurred something like 10 years ago?

Nope. I receive nothing from pharma.

And "thumping" from Quackwatch? LOL. That discredited bunch of shits
couldn't thump their way out of a paper bag.

George M. Carter

"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:lerbn29ib1dcko93388r4cdsb8eaagpmiv@4ax.com...
And in typical George Mary fashion, he goes on to support only
the most minimal aspects of his PharmaGreed:

An amazing memory - if only for the selective details George Mary
overlooks - as in his employment by pharma magazine POZ where
he was paid to impersonate an HIV+ doctor in his column

DR ME

and then there's Carter pushing NAC and the rest of his
pharma-made quack claptrap. And let's not forget about
the PharmaPayola generously provided to the ACT UP
New York and Golden Gate faggots for all their help
with bringing the rest of the gay lemmings to the Pfountain
of Everlasting Life-after-infection... and we ALL know how
that worked out...

As we can see, George Mary was traumatized by his "victimization"
by the good folks at Quackwatch.

On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:00:48 -0500, "Life" <Life@life.com> wrote:

Nope.

They're not even a pharmaceutical company in any event.

That is hardly an example of "greed."

LOL...many people wrote for that column. It did NOT suggest that the
author was a physician nor their HIV status. That's wholly your
imaginary fantasizing.

That's because you have to stretch and fold, spindle and mutilate your
mind to come up with anything that might even remotely support your
point when in actuality--there's no "there" there.

In short--you're a liar and a coward.

George M. Carter