The guy we know as Paul King hides like Binladin. Let us look at the facts
concerning the terriosm of Paul King
1.This guy is amazing he illegally posting from the perth group.
2.Lied about having davey boy sites shut down.
3.He has threaten to killed Davey boy.
4.He has offered bomb making technology to a Canada base dissident group
5.Has been accused of child molestation and is forbidden to work with
children.
6.Aids myth exposed moderator kick him out and has banned the mentioning
of his name in the group.
7.He has hack microsoft servers, peoples personal computers, email
accounts and etc.
8.he has destroyed msn and yahoo support groups hacking the managers email
accounts and sending virus to them.
9.While using one of his many fake alias he accuse a women of being a baby
killer for giving her son who was born with AIDS the meds.
10.8. If he has proof that Aids is a myth why doesn't he give siminars to
discusss this? Why is he hiding behind a computer?

I like 3, 4 and 5. At least they are new additions to your insane
ravings.

Do you really think people believe a word you say?

All you are doing is proving 'AIDS' fanatics are liers and mentally
unstable.


Be my guest.

Paul of course people believe the truth. Hell they have seen your
misinformmation you continue to post.
Listeners have you notice how paul king refuse to disprove what i have
posted? Now who is the lier?

Every word you say is true. Happy now?

"Sadam, has that core material arrived yet?"

"Oh, in that case we have time to molest some kids while we wait"

"Ain't life great....Life akbar!"

sue me ifim wrong

"sue me ifim wrong"

I am sure that would be worthwhile. Clearly you must be making a fortune
as an English professor or some similar interlectual profession.

In article <355566bbe7a98b4a97a463070ceb1d08@localhost.talkab outhealthnetwork.com>,
PaulKing <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote:
How do you become an interlectual? By reading between the lines?

--
David Canzi

"sue me ifim wrong"

So you think this person is well educated and intelligent?

I am sure you do as you will support anyone who share your mad 'AIDS'
mania.

Correction 'shares'.

I was typing too fast.

What the Dingell staff's report had to say

Following are excerpts from the Dingell staff's report:

One of the most remarkable and regrettable aspects of the institutional
response to the defense of Gallo et al is how readily public service and
science apparently were subverted into defending the indefensible.
Neither
(HHS nor Justice Department) officials and attorneys, once the dispute
was under way, (dealt) responsibly with the accumulating evidence that
there were serious problems in the U.S. government's claims. Instead,
they
pushed on with their "litigation strategy," all the while adding
deception to deception, consuming untold resources and squandering
scientific
and international good will.

The fraud became self-perpetuating. Defending the indefensible became
a reflex, until ultimately, the cover-up was so burdened with falsehoods
that its collapse was inevitable. HHS officials and attorneys should have
recognized early on that the falsehoods could not be indefinitely
sustained.
But HHS sought only to "defend the position." HHS did not honor
the public trust.

The violence to principles of responsible, ethical science was just
as profound. At a crucial point early in the (Gallo laboratory's) HIV
research,
international politics and the technocrats committed to those politics
virtually took over that research, claiming the laboratory's putative
accomplishments
as accomplishments of the United States administration and by extension,
the United States itself.

Once done, the (Gallo laboratory's) interests became the government's
interests; defending the (Gallo laboratory) scientists' reputations and
claimed accomplishments became necessary for defending the honor of the
United States. The defense thus became a consuming effort for significant
portions of the U.S. government.

The result was a costly, prolonged defense of the indefensible in which
the (Gallo laboratory's) "science" became an integral element
of the U.S. government's public relations/advocacy efforts. The
consequences
for HIV research were severely damaging, leading, in part, to a corpus
of scientific papers polluted with systematic exaggerations and outright
falsehoods of unprecedented proportions. *

On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 01:56:15 -0500, "PaulKing"
<aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote:

Whatever it was, I sure as HELL wouldn't trust you to post an accurate
or complete account.

You like to distort and change the original story. In short, you're a
liar.

George M. Carter

all he knows how to do is attack people and hack there computers. As far
as his information is concern when he is questions he cowards down and
expects us to be silient and believe his lies.

Paul attempts yet again to confuse his readers by posting a so called report
with out posting enough of the report so that the reader understands the
context of what is being said in the report.

This report if it exists, would have been talking about the legal battle
between Gallo's lab and the French over who was the first to isolate the HIV
virus. It is NOT about in any way the HIV=AIDS findings of Gallo or CDC and
NIH as Paul wants you to believe.

Sorry Paul you've been caught in yet another of you lame attempts to confuse
your readers. You really need to try harder or simply realize that you are
arguing from a position of faith rather the fact and that faith never trumps
truth in scientific discussions.

Gary Stein

"PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote in message
news:4e7d6fc39533e9793bf96f3e76bd7867@localhost.ta lkabouthealthnetwork.com...