On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:07:03 GMT, GMCarter <fiar@verizon.net> wrote: Oh, no. I did. You just didn't like the answers. Gee, that's something a vampire might think, given a lack of their own reflection. Are you some sort of Pharma-Vampire, Mr. Carter?

On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:44:55 GMT, GMCarter <fiar@verizon.net> wrote: Not at all. What we all realize here is obvious to even the most casual observer.

On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:10:23 GMT, GMCarter <fiar@verizon.net> wrote: Carter struggles with the meaning of the word "libel" while he engages it. I must confess that I truly enjoy watching Carter struggle in the quicksand of his fellow-colleague "victim" and buddy Bruce Mirken's arrest on child molesting charges...

On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 04:32:58 GMT, "la libertad es la esclavitud" <bb@miniprod.gov> wrote: The physician is obligated to the patient (and by inference, the insurance company). In the U.S. the doctor has no obligation to the public at large. Socialized medicine would likely change that...

A Move To Banish Latex Products June 28, 2000 BOSTON (Boston Globe) — Josephine Pandolfo's illness began three years ago as a slight rash on her hands, accompanied by chronic sinus headaches. But it progressively got worse. There were days when Pandolfo, a dentist, had difficulty breathing. Her tongue would swell and she couldn't swallow. Then, she almost lost her

On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 18:52:12 -0700, redrum1@alltel.net wrote: Oh, darling, I'm dreadful sorry! What were you dithering about again? You were saying you DO believe HIV exists and causes AIDS? Or were you wearing your denialist hat? Haven't you got your medications adjusted yet again?

Do you dispute condoms contain: - 57 FDA listed toxic proteins? At least 3 FDA listed carcinogens? At least two FDA listed teratogens? That so many known toxic additives must present a health risk?

No. You are a child killer or at least one who supports them.

Thanks Brian, I made an appointment I will discuss everything I found on here with her. I found a good doctor but she's new to Canada, doesn't have good english and always goes to her big medical book for answers and suggestions so I found doing my own research will help her. Small sacrafice, 10 other doctors I saw didn't have time to research. Sometimes I wished we had privatized doctors here like the United States. I gotta get to the bottom of this. Thanks, Jacquie

In article <b9029077c1172735e4042fa3a03bebf6@localhost.talkabouthealthnetwork.com>, PaulKing <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/misc.health.aids/msg/3cf590cec0ec87ec?dmode=source&hl=en -- David Canzi

In article <6e5d2e9b29dee569740f704571dfabbf@localhost.talkabouthealthnetwork.com>, PaulKing <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: Why are you using words like "concede" and "acknowledge" as if this is an embarrassing admission? An early protease inhibitor was found to be deadly in rats and dogs and so was never tried on humans. What conclusion do you think follows from that? Wouldn't your argument be more convincing if it had a conclusion? I've asked you to state your conclusion before

In article <c15f381c4fd6536b627c91429ecd8562@localhost.talkabouthealthnetwork.com>, PaulKing (Mark Hanau) <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: This phenomenon was well-known to mainstream scientists long ago. The title of Maggiore's article is "How a 99.99% Accurate Test Can Be Wrong Half the Time". A better title would be, "How dissidents can pretend something they didn't understand until Popular Science dumbed it down enough for them is a 'new discovery'".

Any excuse to deny the truth. Typical.

Accident my foot!

On Mon, 30 May 2005 00:30:24 -0400, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: Oh, right. I take it back. You don't post articles twice...you post them dozens of times, even tho they have been dissected, refuted and discarded in many cases. And the rest usually do not support your vague thesis that HIV either doesn't exist or maybe it does and doesn't cause AIDS and there aren't any diseases.

On Mon, 30 May 2005 00:22:33 -0400, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: You agree with something I didn't say or remotely suggest. Other diagnostic tests are not "useless" but all tests have their limitations. In your 0/1 world, apparently, there is no room for grey, let alone technicolor! lol/

On Mon, 30 May 2005 00:17:01 -0400, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: He most certainly did.

On Mon, 30 May 2005 00:19:41 -0400, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: Demonstrably incorrect. Even Duesberg recognizes that HIV exists. There are several tests for HIV and antibodies generated to it.

They do not reflect that 'AIDS' exists but simply that the Bengui Definition of 'AIDS' (that fits EVERY old epidemic disease) exists. Old diseases - New name

Dana In 2002, just as Mona got Sean back from ICC, the doctors decided that Dana (Sean’s sister) should be put on AIDS drugs, even though she wasn’t ill. Mona: Dana wasn’t sick. She’d never had a major illness. The doctors said her Tcells were low, so he put her on Viracept, Epivir,Zerit, and Bactrim.