Roedy Green wrote... Of course I was exaggerating the exaggerated Kinsey figure of 10%, something that was never replicated and I'm sure that somewhere along the way I remember hearing suggestions that perhaps a third of the population had tried it once. Anyway, it worked to illustrate some activists might inflate the numbers to reduce the importance of the 45% of HIV infections that are MSM; 10% translates as 4.5x the average rate, 3% translates as 15x the average rate, and of course 45%...

Death wrote: (snip self-hatred) wow, nothing left. B/ awww poor Death. Probly all the pimples and the whole "lack of pubes" thing has him down

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:22:28 -0400, "Iconoclaster" <wgods@xs4all.nl> wrote: And then other times it's pretty clear why.

Death wrote: You'd be well-advised to make sure your pharmacy is giving you the right meds, or check with your doc to see if they need adjusting. You're kooking out like you did before you went on them. B/

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:51:42 -0400, "Fondoo" <dale601@hotmail.com> wrote: It isn't. But I have a better suggestion. Get your butt to South Africa. I mean that in all earnestness. Go to Uganda. Or Thailand. Or Nepal or India. Or Malawi. See that world. Live with the people--be with them. See what is going

Dude your like 15 aren't ya? Your Mommy know your typing naughty words on the internet? Your going to get so busted if she finds out. Tisk Tisk

My wife was diagnosed with breast cancer a few years back. It's funny that when we asked her doctors including her HIV doc why the tumor seemed to grow super fast from a small lump as soon as she had gone on a drug holiday nobody seemed to have the slightest clue. If just one doc would have said the fact she was on a drug that was developed for cancer and being a DNA chain terminator could have something to do with it. I wonder if the docs were that poorly informed or did they just feel our...

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:50:56 -0400, "Iconoclaster" <wgods@xs4all.nl> wrote: What do you consider "valid"? LOL. Yes. You're a hypocrite and full of so much crap you need a Q Tip to clean yer ears.

*snicker*

"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message Lets keep this as honest as you can be. You are the one crying over my choice of words. Rather than condemn the act you attacked the word used, remember? Kewl, then I'll ass-ist your memory. Bigot, racist is what you called me when you objected to the word used.

relatively healthy how do you explain those simple facts?" Facts are never simple where the human body is concerned. In another post you wrote that you refused AZT monotherapy at first. So I assume that you started in 1996, when HAART was introduced. If you were sick then, you made a remarkable recovery. That proves you have a sturdy constitution, capable of withstanding 600 mg of AZT daily. It seems more likely that you got well in spite of the drugs, not thanks to the drugs. If you...

I'm interested to see how this is all going to play out. It's looking like the beginning of the end for the apologists. They were so *focused* on going after Christine, that they got careless. Very careless. Maybe they should have remembered some of the things they had written about Christine before the LA Times article. Things that are in complete contradiction to the assertion that EJ supposedly died of "AIDS-related pneumonia". Maybe they should have remembered some choice words Jeanne

"Brian Mailman" <bmailman@sfo.invalid> wrote in message

....Al-Bayati is not a doctor. He does not treat anyone. that might be correct. but he may advise/consult you on what other people have done and effect of treatments..etc like many alternatieve docter, treat people, but the person in question is under the care of a regular docter. if something might go wrong the regular docter can interfine(stop the treatment). and still decide to go for normal medecine.

"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message A lie lurks here hidden among the bullshit. Anarchy in a gun toting state? You can give me an example, yes?

Ah, but he does, Master David. Battling a whole gaggle of apologists on this forum is not only fun, but will also lead to a thorough understanding of the way people have been misled about the AIDS scare. What is a total mystery to me is why part of the gay community has been clamoring for years for still more funding for drugs that will kill them. Don't you know gay men were targeted from the very start of this nonsense? What we call AIDS now, was originally named GRID (Gay-Related...

From the thread http://groups.msn.com/AIDSMythExposed/general.msnw?action=get_message&mview=0&ID_Message=17261&all_topics=0 on AIDS Myth Exposed: Charmed Hot Dissident, I second that emotion! I was a dissident L-O-N-G before I was told I had "HIV." Even back then I was highly skeptical of doctors. I mean, they're just people! They don't have any more cognitive ability, or logic skills,

On 17 Oct 2005 19:17:40 -0700, "montygram" <nazztrader@lycos.com> wrote: I have in the past. You have clearly been too stupid to understand the explanation so I give up on ya. Duesberg, according to some of your own denialists, is an idiot because he thinks HIV has been shown to exist. Of course, I think he is an idiot because he says silly crap like "it induces antibodies so

john wrote: If there were only a trace of 'scientific investigation' to be found on anything on whale.to. Or a trace of anything scientific at all.

In article <1129265531.011165.164510@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, Chris Noble <ChrisJNoble@hotmail.com> wrote: Johnson wrote the books "Darwin on Trial" and "AIDS on Trial." I have lately started reading talk.origins again after a long time not reading it, and the more I read it, the more similarities I see between the arguments and tactics of creationists and AIDS dissidents. Scientific theories are overturned by one or a few scientists with one