On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 15:55:35 +0200, Moira de Swardt wrote: Obviously you haven't met my penis... <back to topic> It's about time to put these crazymotherfucker christians and fascists back into their respective boxes before they unleash nuclear armagedden.

Don Saklad wrote: Although this comment could apply to virtually any of the denialists post in this group, it is impossible to tell which post you were replying to since you did not quote any previous material. It would be nice if you would put your responses in context.

"Mark" <mlowry3@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:1154483461.099588.101980@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... What are you blathering about? Joe-who? Jan P.S. You are on your daily hobby. I see you continue.

BrainstimPro is a state of art, binaural Generator using 4 wave forms, 16 photolitic color sets, Audio to visual ratio adjust, with 30 presets and 24 programmable presets, unlimited background masking, Programmable ramp, freq sweeps, Adjustable base freq, Adjustable modulation, adjustable durations, While being setup for use by Medical Personal, It is easy to learn for laymen and the average offering an easy of use preprogrammed mode. If you'd like to buy a copy of Brainstimpro, please...

Aids is curable? Please Check the link: http://treatmentforaids.blogspot.com/

kqurtyhar@gmail.com wrote: You should be tested at 3 months' post exposure, and then again at 6 months. That will catch the overwhelming majority of positives. If you really wish to be compulsive, you can get tested another six months after that (1 year post exposure). What you need to think about is what you were you doing, why you were

First, what does your friend's physician say? I think it probably depends on the dose and the indication. If it is for HIV, it may be that he could use a lower dose or for a shorter period. If it is for other indications, may be more difficult. See, e.g., http://www.aidsmeds.com/drugs/Proleukin.htm and http://www.aids.org/factSheets/472-Interleukin-2.html

monty1945@lycos.com wrote: So I take it you have emailed the authors of these studies to ask them: a) whether they have heard of the Perth Group b) whether they think their papers support the claims of the Perth Group c) whether they think you have any idea whatsoever about virology My guess would be - No, No and No! But go ahead. Prove me wrong. Email them.

On 29 Jul 2006 11:56:02 -0700, monty1945@lycos.com wrote: Indeed. I'm an agnostic. But about your scientific rigor? I'm fully aware that yours is mostly mortis. George M. Carter

isopropyl methylphosphonofluoridate wrote: Ah. So you're one of the wood nymphs then. Out to behind the windmill is it? B/

DavidT wrote: The bizarre thing is that Jan does not believe in the whole "germ theory of disease" while Rath claims that HIV exists and causes AIDS. http://www.aids-vitamins.org/virusornot.htm I can only conclude that Jan defends this quack because Rath is anti-establishment in terms of his false claims that vitamins are more effective than ARVs in treating HIV infection.

But the point is that "A.I.D.S" is not infectious....Its the HIV that is said to cause AIDS that medical professional say is infectious. If you inject yourself with the blood of AIDS patients..your not going to die right away of A.I.D.S. You might pick up some HIV with the AIDS that supposedly will get you in trouble later.

On 24 Jul 2006 02:30:08 -0700, "DavidT" <david199@volcanomail.com> wrote: What a horrible thought.

Let's see........ The World according to Monty: In the 1980s, a massive epidemic of fish oil treatment began in Africa, resulting in profound cellular immunodeficiency in populations taking the supplements. It seems that the main consumers of fish oil supplements were firstly the most promiscuous young adults and prostitutes, followed later by their infants. Rather bizarrely, fish oil supplements were not deemed to be necessary for people who had few sexual partners or who were "too old" to...

On 22 Jul 2006 11:26:29 -0700, monty1945@lycos.com wrote: Unfounded premise. State the evidence that leads you to make this statement. Otherwise, the premise is unsupported. George M. Carter

On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:11:45 +0200, "js" <me@nospamplease> wrote: Your latest cause celebre for the cause of AIDS, jannie poo?

On 3 Jul 2006 01:41:12 -0700,jtem01@gmail.com, wrote It is not speculation that mankind is using chimps for food. The circumstances of the handling of "jungle meat" are crude and a butchering individual with a cut on his skin exposed to blood from the butchering could easily contract any blood borne virus. In addition there is a value placed on ingestion of raw meat and this is another possible route. Finally on a certain Carribean island monkey and chimps are

stevie wrote... Well, I suppose I could contract HIV and have the government throw unlimited free health care at me for the rest of what passes for life. Unfortunately, my ailments are mundane and not trendy enough to qualify for free health care like HIV and breast cancer.

Ozzy wrote: And, as is normally the case, Nick was right. The first such vaccine recently received FDA approval, it's called GARDASIL. Anyone that wants to review the efficacy data from the vaccine trials can look at the information from the FDA hearing online here: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/cber06.html#VaccinesandRelatedBiological (it's the May 18 meeting).

"Brian Mailman" <bmailman@sfo.invalid> wrote in message I see you are still confused,......... good.