On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 06:06:50 -0000, Chris Noble <ChrisJNoble@hotmail.com> wrote: I tend not to post full articles, however I always include URLs so others can view them. As I mentioned earlier, it's too late to leave these sort of arguments to the appeal stage. By that time the burden of proof has switched from the prosecution to the defence. And using the 'HIV doesn't

When they say they have "abundant evidence," this usually means that they cranked out a lot of paperwork that does not directly relate to much of anything. There are joke "studies" around that claim that bread, sugar, or anything else that is common causes this or that (for instance, how many criminals have enjoyed sugar-rich food?), due to the "strong associations." This is all the "HIV/AIDS" claim is, along with some specious terminology (claiming that the cellular budding they provoke with...

The thing is that you can't stop a "virus" by making people take drugs for many years that disrupt normal biochemistry. They will just die of something else, as is the case now. In fact, if a virus does not kill quickly (weeks at most, though likely much less), then you can just change your biochemistry and be well. The problem is the "germ theory" propaganda, which has now been refuted by the evidence, which shows that it's the inflammatory response that causes the real damage, not the...

On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 05:56:08 -0700, DavidT <david199@volcanomail.com> wrote: There's a 'get out' if ever I saw one: "Overwhelming evidence to indicate..." Really? Well, perhaps you'd like to explain to us what your interest in HIV and AIDS is. I've asked you before, but that time you conveniently disappeared from this newsgroup.

Death wrote (quoting article)... And what will improved screening accomplish? It doesn't matter which drugs they determine the virus lacks resistance to, the fucktarded crackhead they prescribe the drugs to won't take them properly and his strain will quickly evolve to resist the latest drug cocktail and then he will proceed to transmit the new resistant strain to thousands of others. It would be better to not screen for resistance and let the unscreened cocktails fail so that the patient...

ChinesePingyao518 http://www.py518.comhttp://www.py518.com World culture inheritance history famous city --- PingyaoWorldcultureinheritancehistoryfamouscity---Pingyao oldcity,historical consultation, traveling consultation, culturaloldcity,historicalconsultation,travelingconsultation,cultural relichistorical site consultation, hundred industryrelichistoricalsiteconsultation,hundredindustry information,whenPingyao old city news, Pingyao news,...

On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 21:32:40 +0200, "Alex" <avdeelen.REMOFETHIS1@wanadoo.nl> wrote: It suggests the problems usually put down to HIV and/or AIDS in Africa are really just the same old things they've had for as long as anyone can remember: "The UN says more than a million children each year die from malnutrition. Poor nutrition is one of many factors that weaken a child's immune system, making it harder to recover from malaria,

gobionessert@yahoo.com wrote: Medical advice from Usenet is worth exactly what you paid for it! Talk to your health care provider. -- Larry D. Farrell, Ph.D. Professor of Microbiology Idaho State University

On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 06:53:08 -0500, " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> wrote: I wonder how this ties in with the witch hunt currently going on in Australia against people diagnosed HIV+? It seems a bit petty pursuing people through the legal system for supposedly infecting a handful of people with HIV when the health system puts nearly two thousand people 'at risk.' --

On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 16:11:00 +1200, "tuln" <****@****.com> wrote: I think the followers of the HIV faith have taken some pretty hard knocks. The HIV theory has recently celebrated its 25th birthday, but there's still no cure for the virus. HIV tests still can't detect the so-called virus itself. And the terrible predictions about HIV that have been made during the past 25 years haven't come true.

"Martin" <martin@hiv-poz.co.uk> wrote in message LOL, sounds like he was smoking that pipe.

Or his contributors. Whichever can get at the money first. Alex

"Useful Info" <useful_inf@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1181397470.127096.57570@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... LOL. And not in monkey kidneys used to make vaccines, yeah, right

" Under ordinary circumstances, he said, men may leave their families to work in urban areas, have sex with HIV-infected prostitutes and then return home only to infect their wives, or have numerous concurrent sex partners. " These are 'ordinary circumstances'?? Talk about racist trashtalk. There is another notion that needs some examination,

Innamoramento@gmail.com wrote... You're insane and need to be hauled off in a straightjacket and taken to the nearest mental hygiene facility where they will strap you into a chair, clamp your eyelids open, then proceed to harass you with propaganda slogans until you have been properly re-educated to learn that HIV is not only harmless, but actually kind of cool. It seems unlikely that you could contract HIV through surface contact, but remember that the HIV virus suppresses the immune system...

Death wrote... But they can only decline if they're asked. With verbal consent there is no record to prove that the patient declined to be tested, and I doubt that the doctors promoting verbal consent would be inclined to pass out paper forms to sign to that effect. All the $25 trillion that has been spent on HIV over the last 25 years has been to "raise awareness." But for all the raised awareness and general enlightenment about the wonders of HIV/AIDS, there has been no observable...

Death wrote... I had previously posted a not-so-sarcastic comment about how the San Francisco AIDS department had spent billions of dollars having its employees attend important conferences in Rome, Paris, Tokyo, Hawaii, and Cancún.

On Jun 28, 8:05 pm, " Death" <D...@yourdoor.net> wrote: Of course, education only works if the audience is sane and smart enough to take good advice. Drug addicts tend to be neither. Moving drug law from the criminal to the civil court would permit families to sue the drug supply chain for the costs of treatment for both HIV and addiction. But that aint gonna happen cause the nation is run by rich lawyers who have partners who make too much money from the seizure of assets from drug dealers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disease

On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:23:44 -0700, DavidT <david199@volcanomail.com> wrote: Oh yes, so I did. Well, you've already described it as "reported wrongly" and "misrepresentation." -- <http://www.hiv-poz.co.uk/> Moible: +447939991519