Another of your mindless 'Tis so, tis so' posts. Is that the best you can do?

Is it a bat, is it a plane, no it is a Super Virus that defies all logic and science. It is a joke.

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 06:39:03 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: What tests? What evidence to support "highly prone"? What degree of "false results"? Compared to syphilis tests? Gonorrhea? Breast cancer? HCV? Etc.

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 06:54:55 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: Hee-hee..."interlect" thar....whoo-hoo! DOH! Homersexual

In article <83ad5f9a5c5e4260d0c7d0bd35a9c237@localhost.talkabouthealthnetwork.com>, PaulKing <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: Provide the URL for one such report posted by you in misc.health.aids. I say you can't, because there is no such article. -- David Canzi

"just cause Mullis was too stupid" The Nobel prize winner, unlike Mr. GM Carter "was too stupid". You need to get help for your delusions of grandeur.

"one sees that there are a number of distortioons" How can the manufacturers disclaimers be called distortions. You make no sense. " A more cogent argument has ALWAYS been, how can tests' sensitivity and

Same difference. You know that.

THIS MUST BE THE FIRST PRO CASUAL SEX ARTICLE FROM AN 'AIDS' AND CONDOM BELIEVER. As 'AIDS' is a myth and CLEARLY not an std, this article is only of interest as a interesting twist on the usual anti sex propaganda. Extract: - More Sex Is Safer Sex

NO

On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:15:43 GMT, "Gary Stein" <ge.stein@verizon.net> wrote: snip... Oh, yeah for sure. I've known quite a few such folks. But the story may well be a true one, esp. if the person is on the Neoral for a transplant. All those drugs, a transplant, lord knows what else--this person is a pretty sick puppy and struggling. And of course, everyone has different sensitivities to the side effects.

If Malaria is so good at causing false positive results, explain the following (the second paper is from the list of references supposedly SUPPORTING the role of malaria in causing false-positive results. I have seen some more convincing papers, but fundamentally once you start screening the blood donations used in treating the anaemia in malaria, the rate of positive HIV tests drops - almost as if you're preventing transmission of HIV ;-) Cheers

GMCarter wrote: so does ipecac, it's what it's supposed to do to work effectively. b/

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:51:12 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: Mark here clearly has never used an antibiotic. Tertiary syphilis dementia seems a reasonable diagnosis...

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:46:38 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: Right. Ask the people that use them. With the number of agents available, most everyone I know who has decided to use them has been able to manage. Some with no side effects at all, others with relatively minor ones. Many have suffered side effects. And a few of my friends have died over the last year. They are FAR

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:32:46 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: FIAR FIAR FIAR It is not representing the opinion of the U of Texas.

isnt this not scary! lets say it is true! they dont know even alot about the "hiv virus",lets say cure it! they do temper with i virus they know little about! then oeps, sorry were are wrong again a new from of hiv virus is bron! yuck

may i ask how "old" your young brother is! isnt nice to hear that he is so mentally disturbed. has he any concern about himself, what is his attitude. is it like you only life once so i just make a big party off it for they days i have on this planned. does he sill "fuck" around!

What does that mean?... OLDS Is it a typo? an acronym?

In article <3d7d12a7f2ae7bf89f2a5c6f4c7988ba@localhost.talkabouthealthnetwork.com>, PaulKing <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: Anybody trying to decide whether to believe what you say would care that you've been caught twice, recently, baldly lying. -- David Canzi