- Condoms can't even stop massive sperm
- Posted on 03-21-2005 | 10 Comments
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 21:21:58 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: No it did not. You're lying. Show me where it says that! With a reference to the URL and supporting paper or otherwise I'll just presume you changed the text again.
- "40% of the condoms tested failed at least one of the tests"
- Posted on 03-21-2005 | 5 Comments
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 21:30:36 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: LOL. Bullshit. Promoting "abstinence only" is the reason for withdrawing condom efficacy data. Promoting a peculiar form of christian fundamentalism is central to his administration. It is one of the poles a bipolar administration (e.g., Ashcroft). The other pole is represented by the sick, money/power grubbing, lying and murdering neocons like Cheney and Wolfowitz. The crusader ethic tied to this
- THE BIG CONDOM LIE - 10,000 doctors say
- Posted on 03-21-2005 | 3 Comments
Seems you have been shown to be wrong as well as a rather clumsy liar once again.
- "I thirst"
- Posted on 03-21-2005 | 1 Comments
"Harry" <paminifarm3@netscape.net> wrote in message news:1111383985.385702.173680@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... << snipped a bunch of dribble >> Why didn't you include Alt.NoBody.GivesA.Shit NG? You cross-posting idiot!
- How the test scam works
- Posted on 03-21-2005 | 3 Comments
Seems Carter and friends have no answer to this one. Nice change from their usual BS.
- Sex Crimes
- Posted on 03-21-2005 | 3 Comments
I posted some extracts for those who don't have time to read the whole article.
- The very odd std...or is it?
- Posted on 03-21-2005 | 4 Comments
"Pass on the offer for faggot sex." Actually I'm heterosexual.
- Anecdotal evidence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence
- Posted on 03-21-2005 | 3 Comments
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:52:02 +0100, "Alex" <avdeelen.REMOFE@wanadoo.nl> wrote: Gallo is single--Gallo was not the only one. Try Montagnier, Barre-Sinoussi, Jay Levy and 20 some years of research since.
- Zap Them Babies Dead - Vets too
- Posted on 03-20-2005 | 1 Comments
Don't forget those old blue hair dudes and dudettes and should not be able to feed themselves.
- Condoms pose deadly threat
- Posted on 03-20-2005 | 3 Comments
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:33:53 +0200, Jordan <Jor@danian.org> wrote: Actually, also what's the absolute risk? Compared to the risks associated with STDs and HIV infection....
- "no evidence that more condoms leads to less AIDS"
- Posted on 03-20-2005 | 3 Comments
PaulKing wrote: I would have thought that it was obvious that there is a clear difference between availability and actual use.
- Yet another deadly virus emerges in Africa
- Posted on 03-19-2005 | 4 Comments
"Vigilante" <we.ride@night.now> wrote in message SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, Calif., Feb. 14 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- ViroLogic, Inc. (Nasdaq: VLGC) today announced that the highly pathogenic isolate of HIV recently identified in a New York City resident was characterized at ViroLogic using its PhenoSense(TM), GeneSeq(TM), and Entry Assays to assess resistance to all currently available antiretroviral drugs. The isolate was sent to ViroLogic for more
- The Wonderful, Wacky World of the NIH
- Posted on 03-19-2005 | 1 Comments
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 02:43:28 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: Vaccines activate the immune system. An HIV vaccine will activate the immune system to make proteins against HIV. These may be the same proteins, depending on the vaccine that generate the antibodies tested for by HIV testing kits. So a person would essentially have a false positive test, elicited by
- "the post-HAART group was in worse health"
- Posted on 03-18-2005 | 9 Comments
"AIDS has a much higher risk of morbidity and mortality without them." You can repeat that lie as much as you want but it still remain a LIE.
- a paradoxal increased risk of seroconversion proportional to condom use
- Posted on 03-18-2005 | 3 Comments
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:55:18 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: LOL. I don't have to--you do a fine job.
- Condoms CAUSE serious disease
- Posted on 03-18-2005 | 4 Comments
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:36:06 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: Condoms MAY have some of these chemicals. Where is the evidence they cause ANY disease? LOL--yet you reject the abundant evidence that HIV exists and causes AIDS?
- Additional Praise for The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS
- Posted on 03-18-2005 | 7 Comments
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:42:29 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: Provide the evidence for this hypothesis! Poor people weren't dying of CMV retinitis, cryptosporidiosis, Mycoavium complex, wasting, neurological diseases. Poverty definitely sucks for longevity but these manifestations are new and different.
- Faulty testing proceedures
- Posted on 03-18-2005 | 3 Comments
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:57:30 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: LOL>..again, this was NOT a statement of the U of Texas but a STUDENT's sophist views. Big turd? Damn. You're receding into infantilisms...c'mon, you can do better than that!!
- False claims dropped by CDC and USAID
- Posted on 03-18-2005 | 3 Comments
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:58:32 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: Again, a gross misinterpretation of the data. Found my reply to this email written last May: Hey-here is the citation: http://www.niaid.nih.gov/dmid/stds/condomreport.pdf
- THE FLAWED CONDOM
- Posted on 03-18-2005 | 3 Comments
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:00:53 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: Really? Prove it.
