Fashion, Beauty, Entertainment, Cars, Celebrities > Health & Fitness > HIV / Aids
Zap Them Babies Dead - Vets too
Posted on 03-20-2005 | 1 Comments

Don't forget those old blue hair dudes and dudettes and should not be able to feed themselves.

Condoms pose deadly threat
Posted on 03-20-2005 | 3 Comments

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:33:53 +0200, Jordan <Jor@danian.org> wrote: Actually, also what's the absolute risk? Compared to the risks associated with STDs and HIV infection....

"no evidence that more condoms leads to less AIDS"
Posted on 03-20-2005 | 3 Comments

PaulKing wrote: I would have thought that it was obvious that there is a clear difference between availability and actual use.

Yet another deadly virus emerges in Africa
Posted on 03-19-2005 | 4 Comments

"Vigilante" <we.ride@night.now> wrote in message SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, Calif., Feb. 14 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- ViroLogic, Inc. (Nasdaq: VLGC) today announced that the highly pathogenic isolate of HIV recently identified in a New York City resident was characterized at ViroLogic using its PhenoSense(TM), GeneSeq(TM), and Entry Assays to assess resistance to all currently available antiretroviral drugs. The isolate was sent to ViroLogic for more

The Wonderful, Wacky World of the NIH
Posted on 03-19-2005 | 1 Comments

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 02:43:28 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: Vaccines activate the immune system. An HIV vaccine will activate the immune system to make proteins against HIV. These may be the same proteins, depending on the vaccine that generate the antibodies tested for by HIV testing kits. So a person would essentially have a false positive test, elicited by

"the post-HAART group was in worse health"
Posted on 03-18-2005 | 9 Comments

"AIDS has a much higher risk of morbidity and mortality without them." You can repeat that lie as much as you want but it still remain a LIE.

a paradoxal increased risk of seroconversion proportional to condom use
Posted on 03-18-2005 | 3 Comments

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:55:18 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: LOL. I don't have to--you do a fine job.

Condoms CAUSE serious disease
Posted on 03-18-2005 | 4 Comments

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:36:06 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: Condoms MAY have some of these chemicals. Where is the evidence they cause ANY disease? LOL--yet you reject the abundant evidence that HIV exists and causes AIDS?

Additional Praise for The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS
Posted on 03-18-2005 | 7 Comments

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:42:29 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: Provide the evidence for this hypothesis! Poor people weren't dying of CMV retinitis, cryptosporidiosis, Mycoavium complex, wasting, neurological diseases. Poverty definitely sucks for longevity but these manifestations are new and different.

Faulty testing proceedures
Posted on 03-18-2005 | 3 Comments

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:57:30 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: LOL>..again, this was NOT a statement of the U of Texas but a STUDENT's sophist views. Big turd? Damn. You're receding into infantilisms...c'mon, you can do better than that!!

False claims dropped by CDC and USAID
Posted on 03-18-2005 | 3 Comments

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:58:32 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: Again, a gross misinterpretation of the data. Found my reply to this email written last May: Hey-here is the citation: http://www.niaid.nih.gov/dmid/stds/condomreport.pdf

THE FLAWED CONDOM
Posted on 03-18-2005 | 3 Comments

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:00:53 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: Really? Prove it.

Infertility in Men linked to condoms
Posted on 03-18-2005 | 7 Comments

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:02:26 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: And NOTHING in the article reflects your disingenuous re line. LOL...only stupid to the extent I'm continually surprised by your deviousness. You are SOOOOOOO fucking dishonest, Mark.

CONDOMS KILL and cause birth defects
Posted on 03-18-2005 | 4 Comments

obering news for rubber contraceptive users. * A German scientific research institute has warned that most condoms on the market contain a cancer-causing chemical and has urged that their manufacture be subjected to stringent quality control. * The Chemical and Veterinary Investigation Institute in Stuttgart said on Friday it had found the carcinogen N-Nitrosamine in 29 of 32 types of condoms it tested in simulated conditions.

"Condom use did not have any effect"
Posted on 03-18-2005 | 3 Comments

The Emperor has no clothes! Deconstructing HIV and AIDS Edited by Robert Johnston "The World Health Organization studied prostitutes in a little coastal African country above Liberia. They found that 75 percent of the prostitutes were HIV-positive and predicted that five years later half of them would be dead. In five years they came back and there were no bodies to count. Still they're HIV-positive, according to their tests. (Actually, they're positive due to a cross-reactivity.)

Political agenda behing condom myth
Posted on 03-18-2005 | 1 Comments

PANACEA OR PLACEBO? In conclusion, Herbert Ratner, M.D., offers the best summary of all when he says, Actually, the major accomplishment of the condom campaign to prevent AIDS is to impress the promoters, politicians and the public at large that something is being done; and although well-intentioned, it offers more of a placebo than a panacea. Publicizing the condom to the four winds is, for the most part, the

Looking for stats of hetero & homo sex
Posted on 03-18-2005 | 5 Comments

Ken wrote: not interesting, boring. it's been covered over and over and over again. b/

FAILURES OF THE MEMBRANE OF THE CONDOM
Posted on 03-17-2005 | 13 Comments

You need the sleep. Your brain needs all the help it can get to function.

Condoms cause cancer and birth defects
Posted on 03-17-2005 | 2 Comments

Get cancer and then ask that again.

"not supported by the scientific data"
Posted on 03-17-2005 | 2 Comments

You are the drivel around here Carter.