attic, not attack :) Learn to spell . . . http://paminifarm.com

"From: Lawrence R. Ortik <Lawren...@altavista.net> - Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived. This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Mar 28, 4:25 pm)." Such cowardliness . . .

avdeelen.REMOFE@wanadoo.nl wrote: Great w3ng3114@duskmail.com

banmilk@hotmail.com wrote: Than why did they join the armed forces? Every soldier knows his duty.

How about it other STD's were transmitted through contact without ejaculation, or if they were bacterial rather than viral? Makes sense to me, as someone who's grown both bacteria and viruses in the lab. No-one's claiming that HIV is as infectious as something like gonorrhea, but equally you can't claim it's not infectious at all. Any rebuttal to that article I quoted showing 0% HIV transmission in consistent condom users compared to 4.8% annual rate in inconsistent users?

LOL! More like ignored. The best rebuttal I've seen to these studies is: "I don't believe in PCR", courtesy of Jason Nusbaum. Made me laugh anyway. When idiots like the Perth Group say things like "HIV cannot be found in peripheral blood" I find it amusing to quote articles that can seed several THOUSAND cultures from every cc of whole blood. To claim otherwise is simply lying.

"Uday Hussein" <uday@iraq.net> wrote in message You are in danger of being labeled a homophobe, again, LOL. Your observation is right on the money.

"PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote in message Whatever victory you are looking for, I'll concede it to you.

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 01:22:05 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: Undoubtedly.

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 01:20:27 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: Wow. Pretty bad drivel. Desparation on the part of the denialists who haven't died of AIDS? Why not get David Pasquarelli to contribute to this article?

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 21:29:15 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: HIV is a quickly cured STD?? Indeed.

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 21:27:43 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: LOL. With your sense of numbers, NOTHING adds up.

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 21:21:58 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: No it did not. You're lying. Show me where it says that! With a reference to the URL and supporting paper or otherwise I'll just presume you changed the text again.

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 21:30:36 -0500, "PaulKing" <aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote: LOL. Bullshit. Promoting "abstinence only" is the reason for withdrawing condom efficacy data. Promoting a peculiar form of christian fundamentalism is central to his administration. It is one of the poles a bipolar administration (e.g., Ashcroft). The other pole is represented by the sick, money/power grubbing, lying and murdering neocons like Cheney and Wolfowitz. The crusader ethic tied to this

Seems you have been shown to be wrong as well as a rather clumsy liar once again.

"Harry" <paminifarm3@netscape.net> wrote in message news:1111383985.385702.173680@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... << snipped a bunch of dribble >> Why didn't you include Alt.NoBody.GivesA.Shit NG? You cross-posting idiot!

Seems Carter and friends have no answer to this one. Nice change from their usual BS.

I posted some extracts for those who don't have time to read the whole article.

"Pass on the offer for faggot sex." Actually I'm heterosexual.

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:52:02 +0100, "Alex" <avdeelen.REMOFE@wanadoo.nl> wrote: Gallo is single--Gallo was not the only one. Try Montagnier, Barre-Sinoussi, Jay Levy and 20 some years of research since.