- Naturally Queer
- Posted by GMCarter
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 18:21:58 -0600, " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net>
wrote:
That's not my point--that's your twisted, Rovian perversion!
Precisely what a bigot would do as well.
- Posted by GMCarter
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 18:25:07 -0600, " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net>
wrote:
Indeed. Overdoing it and expressing it inappropriately is a dangerous
pathology.
Love is natural and normal, too. I prefer love to hate.
Sexual desire is natural and normal. I prefer sexual desire to hate.
You prefer hate. Pretty bizarre, frankly.
George M. Carter
- Posted by GMCarter
On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 14:35:46 +1300, Sipora <sipora@at.com> wrote:
Precisely the same thing as the first statement above. You'd claimed
that calling people that use religion to press agendas of hate is not
meaningful. The statement above quite clearly reflects that it is
quite meaningful to call people that pick the bits of religion that
suit their bigotry to be perverts.
Like your Haggard, who turns out to be the deepest kind of hypocrite
to boot.
Now you're backtracking? Your definition of "normal" appeared to be
that only producing progeny in a relationship falls into your
narrow-minded little definition.
- Posted by GMCarter
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 18:26:31 -0600, " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net>
wrote:
So when were you wounded? What happened? Did your father bite your
penis?
- Posted by Death
"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message
Now click your heels together 3 times and say
David Pasquarelli
- Posted by Death
"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message
Light a black candle and say:
David Pasquarelli 3 times
and those ghost will go away.
- Posted by GMCarter
On Sat, 4 Nov 2006 09:05:37 -0600, " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net>
wrote:
Non sequitur.
- Posted by GMCarter
On Sat, 4 Nov 2006 09:09:25 -0600, " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net>
wrote:
So he did. Hmmm...
- Posted by Sipora
In article <ik2pk21udksphuipddqp7him5qu2nmjb55@4ax.com>,
GMCarter <fiar@verizon.net> wrote:
[snip]
This isn't what most people mean by perversion.
If the opposite-sex couples who do not have children are not having
children because they are using contraception, then yes, this is
frustrating nature, and therefore unnatural. This definitely does not
show that homosexual attractions are anything other than unnatural.
[snip]
- Posted by GMCarter
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 14:08:48 +1300, Sipora <sipora@at.com> wrote:
Really? You must know some peculiar people!
snip
I find your definition of "normal" then to be even more peculiar.
Indeed, I'd say it's pretty perverse on a planet that already has far
too many humans that it can reasonably support.
But families have always been more than just mommy and daddy and 2.5
children. That's unnatural! Families are siblings, cousins,
grandparents. Families are struggle. They are backbiting and jockeying
for power. They are love and caring.
They are our human condition. Which naturally includes same sex loving
individuals.
It is natural to love and to hate. Up to you the land in which you
prefer to dwell.
George M. Carter
- Posted by GMCarter
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 11:29:52 -0600, " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net>
wrote:
Good lord what are you dithering about now?
- Posted by Death
"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message
to naturally queer. You do demonstrate naturally ignorant tho.
- Posted by GMCarter
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006 16:41:24 -0600, " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net>
wrote:
....is nothing at all! LOL....darling, it's quite clear you're a
conflicted homosexual. Keep it up! Maybe you can start spouting Jesus
stuff and take Haggard's place.
- Posted by Death
"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote
Glad you agree that you had nothing to offer........again
