- Naturally Queer
- Posted by Death
"brainfart" <fart@brain.org> wrote in message
Exposure Category 1987 1992 1997 2002
MSM 80% 71% 59% 53%
Heterosexual 2% 4% 9% 11%
http://www.sfaf.org/aidsinfo/statist...nsmission.html
stigma doesn't seem to be infecting the hetero population
- Posted by GMCarter
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:11:58 GMT, brainfart <fart@brain.org> wrote:
Sounds like a marvelous place! The Emerald City?
- Posted by GMCarter
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:15:24 -0600, " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net>
wrote:
Yes, encouraging trends in the gay community because we're out, loud
and don't take shit from bigots any more.
- Posted by GMCarter
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:38:30 -0600, " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net>
wrote:
Same sex couples sometimes engage in anal sex. Opposite sex couples
sometimes engage in anal sex. Sometimes they don't.
I'm not interested in goats or animals. Are you?
Stigma snipped.
George M. Carter
- Posted by GMCarter
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:05:32 GMT, brainfart <fart@brain.org> wrote:
Well, no. They aren't!
- Posted by brainfart
GMCarter wrote...
What Death could have pointed out is that the increase in the
heterosexual exposure rate is largely due to women who are
infected by their MSM partners.
- Posted by Death
"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message
Encouraging indeed, 77% of aids cases belong to the trendy.
Reported cases, 19,796 trendy folks infected, 345 for the untrendy.
You take your shit from the end of a strangers dick.
http://www.sfaf.org/aidsinfo/statist...nsmission.html
- Posted by Death
"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net>
I failed to find that in your article about faggot animals.
Not in the least, that is why I am not looking to animals for acceptable conduct.
Stigma is not infected therefore can
not promote the spread of hiv/aids.
- Posted by Death
"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:ti6fk2pdj1d19t8fc1l2pca62r71m8c3h9@4ax.com...
http://www.sfaf.org/aidsinfo/statist...nsmission.html
stigma doesn't seem to be infecting the hetero population
- Posted by Sipora
In article <gfbek25tp8ilnavje04frsna2bqnofilqn@4ax.com>,
GMCarter <fiar@verizon.net> wrote:
How?
How?
The fact that animals do something does not necessarily make it "normal".
- Posted by GMCarter
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:07:29 GMT, brainfart <fart@brain.org> wrote:
That does happen in some cases. MSM who are married do represent a
portion of the population. But "largely due" is unsupported. What data
are you using to base that claim?
Indeed, this underscores the point that the stigma and discrimination
that result in cheating and hiding are what drive the epidemic.
George M. Carter
- Posted by GMCarter
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:13:53 -0600, " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net>
wrote:
"Trendy"? HIV infection is trendy to you. How bizarre.
The numbers you look at are in San Francisco. The corresponding
figures for the country as a whole are higher.
- Posted by GMCarter
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:13:53 -0600, " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net>
wrote:
"Trendy"? HIV infection is trendy to you. How bizarre.
The numbers you look at are in San Francisco. The corresponding
figures for the country as a whole are higher.
LOL. You know nothing about me. But clearly it does give you a tiny
bit of a woody, deosn't it?
Thanks for sharing the data. They underscore that the trend of new HIV
infections among MSM is declining while it is rising among
heterosexuals.
HIV infection is a disease. One I would not wish upon anyone and
believe that public policy should be driven by evidence-based
approaches to stem the spread of new infections.
For people like you that celebrate people suffering and dying of
AIDS...well, suffice it to say that you have a far worse disease. One
that has poisoned you. One that you will die with as a horrific choice
that perhaps only as you breathe your last you will recognize for the
vile and pathetic waste of your life that it is.
George M. Carter
- Posted by GMCarter
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:21:42 -0600, " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net>
wrote:
snip
LOL...anal sex really turns ya on, huh? You were SO disappointed not
to see some hot pictures of butt fucking, eh?
Poor conflicted dear.
- Posted by GMCarter
On Wed, 01 Nov 2006 15:42:07 +1300, Sipora <sipora@at.com> wrote:
By countering the argument made by some fundamentalist religious
perverts that same sex coupling is "unnatural" as a part and parcel of
their bigoted assault upon our community.
By making people feel shame about who they are. The sexual puritanism
of "abstinence only" is akin to "just say no." It doesn't work. And
then people act out on natural urges in secret.
It's normal for me. I am naturally attracted to a very tiny proportion
of the population of males. This is true for a significant proportion
of the population of humans.
It is natural and normal. Do you not agree? If not, why not?
What bothers you about same gender attraction?
George M. Carter
- Posted by GMCarter
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:23:25 -0600, " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net>
wrote:
snip
LOL. To the absolute contrary. Aside from the fact that you are only
looking at one region, even THAT figure for that area says that 23%
are not about MSM. So it is by definition not "synonymous" with
homosexuality.
Indeed, that 77% figure is MSM. It says nothing about lesbians.
Therefore, you make my case that homosexuality and HIV are not
synonymous.
However, MSM are indeed a vulnerable population.
George M. Carter
- Posted by Sipora
In article <2j0hk2tum7tuamfvaliqejspi8926v2ph8@4ax.com>,
GMCarter <fiar@verizon.net> wrote:
That's rather offensive language. You may be using it without really
thinking about what you're saying, which is a terrible idea. Calling
people you dislike "perverts" for no good reason suggests that you are
too eager to use that word. I won't speculate about the reasons why.
You are suggesting that unsafe and promiscuous behaviour among
homosexual men is caused by their shame about being homosexual? Did it
occur to you that many of them behave that way just because they like it?
I've no idea how you could know that you are "naturally" attracted to
the same sex. If you are claiming to be attracted only to other gay men,
I must say I find that highly implausible - in most cases, you probably
wouldn't know when you first look at him whether a man is gay or not.
Homosexual attractions are not normal because they do not encourage
reproduction, the main evolutionary function of human sexual behaviour.
- Posted by Death
"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message
its fucking other males (behavior) and then bringing its dis-ease to the
female (behavior) is what underscores: what drives this pandemic.
- Posted by Death
"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message
I know you won't take responsibility for
your words without some excuse.
Place it here for my amusement.
- Posted by Death
"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net>
to provide any evidence to prove :Naturally queer?
Am I disappointed, LOL, it's what I expected from you!
