- Michael Crighton, HIV and "Consensus" Science"
- Posted by Alex
HIV "science" is the epitomy of science by consensus. If anyone
remembers the Durban Declaration, it was a mission statement that
HIV really causes AIDS, and it was supposed to be true, because
5000 healthcare professionals signed it.
Alex
Quote:
"I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that
ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus
has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by
claiming that the matter is already settled."
"Let's be clear: ...Consensus is the business of politics. Science, ...requires
only one investigator who happens to be right... The greatest scientists in
history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.
"There is no such thing as consensus science. If it's consensus, it isn't science.
If it's science, it isn't consensus. Period."
~ Michael Crichton ~ Director, Author, Academy award winner as well as
an Emmy, Peabody, and a Writer's Guild of America award winner. Creator
of the television series ER and a Harvard Medical School Graduate
- Posted by Bong
"Alex" <avdeelen@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message
news:423683e3$0$50986$dbd4b001@news.wanadoo.nl...
Fuck statistics and your denial of HIV and AID's - you're still going to die
like your bum chums, and we'll still say you died of AID's (Arsehole
Infected Death Sentence)
William A. Bong (My Own Name)
- Posted by sportsfan
"Alex" <avdeelen.REMOFE@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message
news:423683e3$0$50986$dbd4b001@news.wanadoo.nl...
a lot about a subject that is being researched on an ongoing basis by
medical scientists the world over. Your views seem to reflect your
interpretations of some statistics you have dug up somewhere. Are
you a statistician or a medical person or just a nut.
Do you believe your warped opinion is more justified than 5000
healthcare professionals.?
Richard
- Posted by Gary Stein
So Alex if 5,000 scientists signed a document saying they agreed with
Einstein that E=MCsquared would you call that document an example of
consensus science?
If not why not? Also explain how that statement is different from the Durban
Declaration.
Gary Stein
"Alex" <avdeelen.REMOFE@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message
news:423683e3$0$50986$dbd4b001@news.wanadoo.nl...
- Posted by David Canzi -- non-mailable
In article <423683e3$0$50986$dbd4b001@news.wanadoo.nl>,
Alex <avdeelen.REMOFE@wanadoo.nl> wrote:
It has been known to happen, on occasion, that a large majority of
scientists has come to agreement on a theory as a result of the
theory being correct.
--
David Canzi
- Posted by Alex
"sportsfan" <bignose@telkomsa.net> schreef in bericht
news:d16ddh$a5b$1@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net...
You'd never know that if you heard the activists.
"HIV tests" are "99% accurate". "One in five South Africans
is HIV positive." Etc. All bunk.
Alex
- Posted by PaulKing
An interesting fact is that 90% of what is believed by science at ANY time
in history has later proved to be wrong.
'AIDS' will be a great example of that in the future.
- Posted by PaulKing
"Fuck statistics"
Let's just blindly believe in 'AIDS' like the morons we really are.
- Posted by PaulKing
The statistics are supported by the latest information released from South
Africa.
The 'nuts' on this board are the fools who still believe in 'AIDS'.
