Lancet (01/20/90) Vol. 335, No. 8682, P. 168
Friedman-Kien, Alvin E., et al.

Abstract: Researchers Alvin Friedman-Kien and colleagues report what they believe to be an
increase in the frequency of Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) among homosexual men who do not have HIV.
They report the cases of six HIV-negative gay men with KS, five of whom reported the use of
inhaled nitrite (poppers) and four of whom had one or more venereal disease. The researchers
write that epidemiology of KS suggests it may be caused by another sexually transmitted agent
that may have become widespread among gay men at about the same time as HIV. The researchers
say they suspect most people with KS would be symptomless because lesions are usually only seen
in those with immunodeficiencies.

The "experts" have visions of the "germ theory" dancing in their heads.
The body can handle "germs" easily (except under the most extreme of
conditions, which researchers can cook up in labs) unless you are
exposing your body to powerful toxins and other stressors. I have no
doubt that I could create all the "indicator diseases" of "HIV/AIDS" in
anyone, including those said to be "HIV negative," but it would be
unethical to do so. In any case, if you were to get a bunch of "HIV
negative," young, and apparently healthy gay guys and isolate them so
that they could not "catch" "HIV," then expose them to poppers and
other illegal drugs, alcohol, lack of sleep, unprotected anal sex
(semen is very rich in immunosuppressive PGE2), "junk food" diet, etc.,
for a couple of years, then give them AZT for a couple of years, they
would be "dying of AIDS" as well, even though "HIV" could not possibly
be present.

But guess what? The "experts" will not accept this, because the way
they define "AIDS," it actually supercedes the scientific method. And
once that is done, you no longer have science. I will adhere to the
scientific method, and let history judge those who do not, such as the
"HIV/AIDS experts" of today.

<monty1945@lycos.com> wrote in message
OK, I'm a little slow. What germs are we talking about ?

Poppers, perhaps Viagra or Ecstasy ?

Yeah, that sounds easy, but could you do that in those said
to be hiv positive ?