http://proliberty.com/observer/20050117.htm
IDS earns an "A"
This article will challenge what you have been told about AIDS.
As you will see, immune deficiencies were identified as early as 1952
and their causes were then attributed to chemical exposure. The only
thing that changed was the "discovery" of a "virus" that allegedly
"causes" infected persons' immune systems to fail.
by Jim Penick, Health Practitioner
What is now called AIDS is an aggregate of many diseases that have
actually existed in medical literature for several decades.
Older editions of the Merck Manual, often referred to as a
physician's "bible," listed many immunodeficiency diseases under the
title of "immune deficiency syndrome (IDS)."
In the 14th edition of the Merck Manual (1952) under the listing of
"immunodeficiency" diseases you will find reference to IDS, as well as
lyphocytopemia, leukocytopenia, A gamma globulin anemia, Kaposi sarcoma
and others.
The "A" for "acquired" was deliberately added to an existing disease
called IDS.
In this particular edition of the Merck Manual you will also find a
listing of causes for IDS, long before we ever heard of AIDS, some of
which are as follows: Cytotoxins (all poisons including alcohol,
thimerosal/mercury, fluoride, etc. that kill cells), drugs, radiation,
anti-metabolite therapy, and immunosuppressive drugs.
The contrast of Merck's 1952 explanation for the cause of immune
deficiency and the one in use today for [A]IDS begs some interesting
questions:
* Have viruses taken over for drugs as the cause of these deficiencies?
* Do the causes listed in the Merck Manual no longer exist?
* Were the medical researchers incorrect in listing the earlier causes
when they "should have been" looking for a virus? or
* Is focusing on a viral cause more lucrative to the pharmaceutical and
chemical companies than blaming it on the toxic products and byproducts
of their industries?
Recipe for [A]IDS
The disease called AIDS is a complex disease involving insufficient
lymphocytes, leukocytes or other white blood cells critical to bodily
mechanisms which keep the blood pure. These white blood cells apprehend
any alien and non-nutrient materials and organisms in the bloodstream,
surround them and process them for expulsion.
The average American indulges in 20 to 40 poisoning acts per day
(poisons include caffeine, tobacco, soft drinks, alcohol, condiments,
preservatives, drugs - prescription, over-the-counter and
recreational-toxic foods, etc.). The bloodstream, therefore, is
constantly assaulted with poisons.
Likewise, the faculties that create these defensive mechanisms (namely
the bone marrow and lymph organs and tissues) are constantly under
siege from poisons, hence they lose their ability to create many types
of white blood cells. The result is AIDS.
HIV and [A]IDS
The pharmaceutical industry, however, has convinced most people that
certain types of viruses cause the destruction of these defensive
faculties.
The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has never been proven to be the
cause of AIDS or any other illness. After more than 20 years, the role
of HIV in the development of AIDS remains an unsubstantiated theory. No
scientific evidence demonstrating how HIV causes immune dysfunction has
ever been published anywhere in the world.
Retroviruses were studied by governmental research scientists for over
25 years as a possible cause of cancer, specifically because they do
not destroy cells. Now it is claimed that the retrovirus HIV causes
AIDS by destroying the cells of the immune system; and yet the genetic
structure of HIV makes it no different from other harmless
retroviruses.
Dr. Peter Duesberg, a pioneer in retrovirus research stated: "The fact
that 4,126 cases of AIDS have been recorded with absolutely no presence
of the HIV alone makes it impossible for AIDS to be caused by HIV."
AZT
Most AIDS victims are being treated with AZT (azido-thymedine). It was
a drug looking for a disease. Designed to wipe out cancer cells, it is
administered for a very limited time to allow recovery from its
devastating effects to the immune system.
AZT was determined to be too toxic; it had never been given to humans
prior to the first AIDS trials. Now AZT is being marketed as a
treatment for immune suppression and is prescribed for daily,
continuous use. The drug's package insert, however, clearly states
that AZT causes acquired immune deficiency!
As you can see, AIDS victims are succumbing to the treatment and not
the disease itself.
Special [A]IDS immune theory
Let's consider what is meant by immunity. This is important if we are
to grasp the entire AIDS picture. We are told that if we get a vaccine
injected into us, or even taken orally in some cases, that we will
develop antibodies to the vaccine antigen such that, when we are
invaded by the real thing we will not get the disease-the body will
be immune and the antibodies will quickly destroy the virus.
That rationale has always been used by the organized medicine to
support its vaccination programs. Of course that rationale is erroneous
since diseases are always body initiated and conducted. In other words,
the accumulation of toxins in the body creates the breeding ground for
the pathogens-and not the other way around.
Now we are being told, in the case of AIDS, antibodies to HIV are not
regarded as an immune factor but just the opposite! While the so-called
AIDs "virus" is not in evidence, titers being made of fluid and tissues
taken from people are said to contain HIV antibodies.
The fact that those having HIV antibodies do not have the virus should
be, by immunization rationale, evidence that they have immunity to
AIDS. Instead, they are declared to be "HIV positive.
Such blatant contradictions can't stand reason's scrutiny.
The elephant and the flea
To further illustrate the virus rationale being foisted on us, we are
going to use as an example, the head of a dead flea. Now let's
presume that a flea's head is about one billionth the size of an
elephant. This is the same size comparison Guyton's Textbook of
Medical Physiology establishes for a virus (flea head) to a cell
(elephant). What we call a virus is actually a genome, or genetic
material. Genomes are to cellular mitochondria what heads are to fleas
and other animals.
In presenting the virus rationale, we are asked to believe that a
flea's head attaches itself to an elephant, injects itself into an
elephant and takes command of the elephant! Never mind that the flea
head is dead. All so-called viruses (genomes) are dead. None are
living. Why? Because to any thinking person, they are a fractionated
part of what was a living organism. But yet it can do things like take
over an elephant's mind... Upon taking over the elephant, it commands
it to reproduce its "dead" head and the elephant reproduces the flea
head thousands upon thousands of times. When the elephant replicates
about 20,000 to 30,000 flea heads, it "explodes" and the flea heads are
free to seek out other elephants and repeat the process.
like saying that if you inject yourself with a fraction of an ounce of
a substance, it will cause so much pressure inside you that you will
explode.
Special [A]IDS "virus"
We are asked to believe in obligatory reproduction. That means that
another organism is obligated to reproduce an alien organism. Have you
ever witnessed, in all of nature, anything reproducing anything other
than its own kind? What exactly halts obligatory reproduction once it
is established?
Guyton's Medical Textbook acknowledges that viruses have no
reproductive system, no locomotion, no metabolism, and cannot be
reproduced as live entities in vitro. But, yet, these non-entities are
credited with such actions as "injecting" themselves, "incubating,
lying in wait, invading, commanding, infecting" and being "deadly."
Undoing the deception
More than 500 of the world's most prominent scientists have banded
together to form the "Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the
HIV-AIDS Hypothesis." Robert E. Willner, a noted research scientist and
author of "Deadly Deceptions," has traveled the world and, under very
strict clinical conditions, injected AIDS and HIV patients' blood
into his own body. To date he has failed to "catch" AIDS.
For the past 10 years I have begun my health classes by commingling my
blood with those who have been diagnosed with AIDS and other
communicable diseases. Perhaps one day I will succeed in "catching" one
of those elusive viruses!
We natural hygienists have restored thousands of AIDS victims to health
via fasting. Once they cease the cause of their miseries and adhere to
Nature's laws, vibrant health inevitably follows.
Sustained faith in medical "cures" is most commonly acquired by a
voluntary suspension of observation and reason. Drugs and drug taking
is the grand delusion of our age.
It seems as if the grand experiment of mankind has ever been to
ascertain how far they can transgress the laws of Nature, how nearly
they can approach to the very point of death, and yet not die, at least
not die so suddenly and violently as to be compelled to know that they
have destroyed themselves.
Bush donates $500 million to help deliver dangerous AIDS drug
nevirapine to Africans
Beginning December 14, 2004, the Associated Press began publishing a
series of three articles on President Bush's $500 million donation to
African AIDS relief efforts. The main purpose of the donation was to
purchase quantities of a dangerous AIDS drug called nevirapine from the
manufacturer and give it to African women. Critics of the Bush donation
believe that fatal results of the drug's usage in the U.S. have
diminished sales so, using tax dollars to buy stockpiled doses of
nevirapine from the manufacturer and then give it free to Africans was
a solution to the problem.
Nevirapine is said to have certain reactivity with HIV-1-the "virus"
that has never been proven to cause "AIDS."
By Liam Scheff
Dr. Edmund Tramont, Head of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)
AIDS division, was outed by fellow NIH AIDS researcher Dr. Jonathan
Fishbein, for burying evidence of drug toxicity in an African drug
trial. Documents obtained by the Associated Press show that Tramont
censored reporting of thousands of toxic reactions and at least 14
deaths in the ongoing Nevirapine study in Uganda.
Nevirapine is the key component of George W. Bush's $500 million
donation to get AIDS drugs to Africans.
South African President Thabo Mbeki accused the U.S. of using Africans
as "guinea pigs." The Rev. Jesse Jackson echoed the statement, calling
the cover-up "an outrage."
The media has seized on this like it's news, but the truth about
Nevirapine was known in 2000, when the FDA put a black-box label on the
drug, warning of the drug's ability to cause fatal liver damage and
bloody rupturing of skin and flesh.
The drug's manufacturer, Boehringer Ingelheim, had originally slotted
the drug for pregnant HIV-positive women in the U.S. But Nevirapine's
toxicities were so great, they pulled it out of the FDA approval
process. Then they did what all AIDS drug manufacturers do with their
garbage - dump it into the gay, Black or foreign market and tell the
soft-headed liberal media that it's an "antiretroviral" that will
stop AIDS.
Scheff's article was originally posted to the Guerrilla News Network
website at www.gnn.tv/articles/
Note: John James of www.aidsnews.org countered the AP stories as
sensational and inaccurate. He agreed that studies show nevirapine is
dangerous and can cause AIDS infections in women to mutate, making them
more difficult to treat in the future, and recommended the use of
regimen-intensive drugs like AZT instead. He also mentioned that
nevirapine is more convenient because women can take it for a short
time without causing people around them to suspect they have AIDS.
