Lou was a graduate psychology student of Carolyn Miller
She performed an energy healing on Lou
Then again at the time he was suffering from Kaposi sarcoma
Miller and her meditation group did an energy healing
She focused on Lou - since he was on her. . .
About a week or so later Carolyn received a phone call from Lou
He asked her if she did a healing on him on that particular day because
he felt her healing energy that he recognized from his earlier healing
with her.
He explained to her that the next morning when he woke up, all of his
spots were gone.
He went into remission
Unfortunately he died of AIDS about a year later.

As the result of my research into alternative spiritual heals, in
particular from the Course, the idea that behavior change without the
source of love is not lasting is demonstrated in Lou's case. In
other words, if Lou had taken up the study of changing his mind, his
attitude, or his reality, I suspect that his healing would have been
complete. The lesson to be learned is that if your healing was the
result of an energy healing, then you need to follow-up with a study of
spiritualizing your mind.

I recommend the following:

1. Christian Science healing, namely, the practice to deny
body-identification, e.g., sickness, sin, and death are not real, and
affirm spirit-identification, e.g., I am the image and likeness of God,
I am the image of love.

2. Serge King's Huna, Mastering Your Hidden Self. King's method is the
scientific method of integrating your conscious/awareness,
subconsciousmemory, and superconscious/intuition. He teaches you how
to create your own reality, which is nothing more than the practice of
Christian Science self-healing. Or its about the methodology of
accentuaring the positive, eliminating the negatives, and don't mess
around with Mr. In-between. It'll help you to get up every morning in
a positive frame of mind, look at your self in the mirror every day and
really like what you see. How simple can life be!


Joe & Peter, father & son (p. 23)
The short story
Joe suspected that something was not right with his son
He thought that he wanted to quite law school
He contacted Caroline Myss for an intuitive reading of his son
With the permission of Peter Caroline did a reading
The reading was something she had never experienced
She telephoned Peter and learned that it was AIDS
Joe called Caroline to ask: What's up?
Her confidentiality code prevented her to disclose her findings
Joe called back and said, "even if it's AIDS. . ."
She said - be prepared for just that
He called back again and said, "He and his son would be in her parlor
the next day at noon." And they were.
Together with Dr. C. Norman Shealy, they designed a therapy for Peter
Peter healed and became a practicing attorney.

It's my feeling that the key factor in Peter's healing was the deep
love that his father demonstrated towards his son. Reflect on the
Course's idea that behavior change is not possible without the source
of love.


The other story, from the same book, is the story of Per (p. 276)
The short story
Unlike Peter Per's healing was an exercise of self-healing, a
spirituality of turning inward
Among other things he practiced meditation and experienced that inner
experience, enlightenment

It seems to me that Per is an excellent example of aspects of the
Course's know thyself. I'm saying aspects because his story does not
fully disclose the particulars of his healing.

I'm hoping that Miller and Myss' accounts of AIDS will be of some help
to you.

Ke'iko

It is easy to heal a myth. Simply don't take toxic meds.

A faith healers dream come true.

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:06:18 -0500, "PaulKing"
<aimulti@aimultimedia.com> wrote:

Indeed! David Pasquarelli followed this advice assiduously and now he
is CURED! No more virus.

Sadly, he's dead.

Died of AIDS. Cause he believed the nonsense fools like Paul post.

On 21 Jan 2005 16:34:46 -0800, "ke'iko" <keiko4love@yahoo.com> wrote:

snip
Then Lou is not dead if death is not real! Wheeeee!!

"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> schreef in bericht
news:vmc4v0hjbi58e0a5ltt94m0hnkpju6e4p5@4ax.com...
You're saying that if he'd used AZT, he'd still be alive?
I thought there was no cure for AIDS?

Alex

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 01:18:17 +0100, "Alex"
<avdeelen.REMOFE@wanadoo.nl> wrote:

snip
There is no cure for AIDS. And he did try ARV after a couple of bouts
of PCP and cryptococcal meningitis. I think he was convinced that he
was getting these horrible diseases because his immune system was
fucked up by HIV infection. Not some fantasy. Not some conspiracy. Not
a couple of weeks in jail.

But a horrific, killing virus.

I'm saying had he not bought your stupid lies and bullshit, he could
have been monitoring his condition. He could have treated more
aggressively with a range of things (including botanicals). And yes,
damn right, he could have used ARV earlier on, consistently and
probably would NOT be dead today.

George M. Carter

i dont know muts about david pasquarelli! but what i have read that he
dead after beining in prison. they said because of malnutrition, stress,
dyhdrated..his body gave up and left mother earth.

but i think you dont die of a litte malnutrion,stress...etc. so something
had to be out of balance !

but if hiv causes aids. why doesnt everybody who are infected( so the say)
get "aids"

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 07:05:32 -0500, "tsip29" <nnormen@hotmail.com>
wrote:

then why did his HIV+ friend, in for the same time, not get sick?

Why did Mandela survive DECADES in prison in South Africa without
getting AIDS?

Now you're getting it....

Why doesn't everybody infected with TB bacilli develop tubercular
pneumonia? Or those exposed to Ebola virus die hemorrhaging?

The horrible thing is that over 90% of HIV+ people do eventually
develop AIDS if they don't get treatment.

George M. Carter

"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> schreef in bericht
news:9817v0t3ntvvd0k4gtp54npnsqu586ohaj@4ax.com...
No offense, but as a child I used to get bronchitis all the time.
Fortunately, there was no such notion as "HIV" and I was
never tested for it.

Here is an interesting piece on PCP from AIDS.ORG:

http://www.aids.org/factSheets/515-P...monia-PCP.html

" WHAT IS PCP?

" Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP or pneumocystis) is the most
common opportunistic infection in people with HIV. Without
treatment, over 85% of people with HIV would eventually
develop PCP. It has been the major killer of people with HIV.
However, PCP is now almost entirely preventable and treatable. "

Without treatment, 85% of people with HIV get PCP? So that
would mean that PCP would be _the_ AIDS defining illness, right?
Which would mean that PCP would be the prime killer in
the third world.
Odd then, that so many "AIDS" deaths are written up as
malaria, tuberculosis, and of course with the advent of HAART
and nevirapine and azt, as liver failure, kidney failure, etc.

Alex

(PS, also note they recommend Bactrim to treat PCP.)

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 02:16:05 +0100, "Alex"
<avdeelen.REMOFE@wanadoo.nl> wrote:

Bronchitis is not AIDS. Bronchitis is not PCP.

Perhaps when you were a child, there was no test for HIV. I don't know
how old you are. Older than 23?

LOL. Wrong. The 85% refers to people in the west where PCP is more
prevalent. Histoplasmosis is a real disease, you'll agree? Why doesn't
everyone get it?

Malaria kills. TB kills. ARV can kill. Malaria+HIV is an interesting
mix---I'm still not clear on it, tho it looks like the two together
aren't so great. TB+HIV kills faster. HIV without ARV kills a lot more
than HIV+ARV.

They certainly do and for good reason. It works. Are you suggesting
they should not treat PCP? Or that you know of something else?

George M. Carter

GMCarter wrote:



die within the next three days but his doctor was successful in getting
him into an experimental cancer drug program).

The short story of Mr. Wright's bought with cancer is that he was twice
miraculously healed when given the experimental cancer drug in spite of
the fact that his second therapy was a placebo. The undoing of Mr.
Wright's success is that his belief was absolute in the experimental
drug rather than in himself.

What this means is that when he read the results of the program's
failure to cure cancer again, he once again became a dying man. The
consequence of the second attempt is that his hopes of a cure vanished
and he died.

Of David, without knowing the particulars, my guess is that he was
confident in his healer, and his practice, but it failed to address the
problem of modern man, that is, modern man in need of a healing, a
spiritual identity, and a relationship with God, such that modern man
is in need of a lifestyle that reflects: "life with nature, life with
man, and life with spirituality." The source of Love.

In other words, behavior change - healing - is not lasting without
the source of love - probably because when you're in love, all
things are possible because your thoughts are all positive/creative.
Even the idea of going through fear to love is no problem.

The power of the mind is incredible - I'm sure you'll agree.
Ke'iko

On 24 Jan 2005 15:26:59 -0800, "ke'iko" <keiko4love@yahoo.com> wrote:

snip
It absolutely is! And it should be harnessed in the healing process.
Your anecdote was interesting but also instructive.

Let's be clear--the power of the mind is NOT about trying to attain
immortality. Won't happen. The power of the mind is in learning to
accept one's mortality in part.

In that--and in finding love--one CAN mitigate the course of disease.
There is no doubt in my mind about that. And through the power of the
mind, the heart, the spirit, one can change one's daily routine and
outlook in life. Every breath, every moment is indeed sacred even
embedded in the quotidian.

Use that to make choices. Every moment. It is about empowering the
self to healing, yes. It is about accepting the RIGHT to die as much
as to live. Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the way some
fellow quipped.

How do you want this life to be?

Yes. Taking the meds is a choice. Wearing a condom is a choice. Taking
another breath is a choice.

Within the matrix of life is the predatory reality of people, of
pathogenic organisms, of the rotting of our aging bodies as we
approach our own death.

Did the power of the mind save those kids in the tsunami? Or spare the
US another four years of W?

No--there IS an outside world and outside influences.

Shape the life, the heart, the spirit in honor and recognition of
those forces and marvel at the simple act of being!

Healing is a part of that dance and process. Using the mind, the
heart, the body, the spirit all as one great force and make your
choices consciously.

George M. Carter

GMCarter wrote:

In the Course
it is for this reason
we are taught not to advise the student to discontinue his med therapy
while the student's mind is still connected to body-identification
Ke'iko

GMCarter wrote:

According to the Course, Lou is sleeping once again. In the New
Testament, Jesus brings a certain dead girl back to life, he is told to
forget it because the girl died. He replied that the girl was
sleeping.

Ke'iko

GMCarter wrote:

Of course you're correct to a certain degree. I think the best
medicine for a situation like this is to be on both med therapy and on
the spirituality of the Course. Now why didn't something think of
that. . . . . . .

Ke'iko

GMCarter wrote:
George, the below quote is from The Aquarian Conspiracy by Marilyn
Ferguson. Ferguson's research focuses on the evolution of the human
mind and I'm thinking that you'll find her book fascinating
reading.

Becoming by Manulani Aluli Meyer on page 124. It's being said in
Manu's PhD dissertation.

The thing about our time that it's being said is that Manu is talking
about what her people practiced thousands of years ago.

Anyhow, after reading the quote - you might ask yourself: "I wonder
what John Shimotsu is doing these days?

Ke'iko


CHILDREN OF THE NEW PARADIGM

Karl Pribram once commented that a new generation will learn about
paradox in the early grades and will grow up understanding concepts of
primary and secondary levels of reality. Not long thereafter,
coincidentally, a junior-high student John Shimotsu of Los Angeles
tried his hand at interpreting for his fellow eighth graders the
holographic model of reality proposed by Pribram and physicist David
Bohm. In conclusion, he said:

Why can't you perform actions that we consider paranormal? I think
it is because you do not think you can. You may say you wish to, or
may sincerely want to, but that will not change what you subconsciously
think. Our culture says that those actions would not be possible, so
that is what you think is real. To change your reality, you would have
to alter your innermost thoughts. The holographic idea is fascinating.
What is theory today may be fact tomorrow (Ferguson 320-1).