On 31 Dec 2006 19:09:01 -0800, "Truth PLEASE!"
<comments@hiv-aids-factorfraud.com> wrote:

blah blah blah. Same old tired crap that says nothing, means
nothing--except that when people think you're speaking anything
remotely like the truth, they wind up with opportunistic infections
and dead with AIDS. If people with HIV use ARV and treat the OIs, they
live much longer--possibly approaching a normal lifespan.

Meantime, in your jibber-jabber, you made claims you obviously can't
back up because you're an anonymous coward.

George M. Carter

"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message
LOL

GMCarter wrote:
George,
400,000 people did NOT live normal lafespans in the last 20 years of
your HIV/AIDS quackery. They are DEAD! And I knew some of them. That's
more than 6 times the number of US servicemen killed in Vietnam...and
you say "this says NOTHING and MEANS NOTHING!"
You are a danger to the human race. I have already backed up my claims
time and time again with you. I want you to back up yours! Tell us
George, JUST HOW does HIV ACATUALLY cause AIDS???? One on one T-cell
direct infection, lymph node hybernation migration, and viral load
explanations are ALL dead!

You have NO way of explaining how HIV causes AIDS, just like Nobel
Prize winner and PCR inventer Kary Mullis, and Dr. Peter Duesberg have
said for over 20 years! You will never be able to prove that HIV causes
AIDS any more than you can prove the earth is flat, because basic
scientific fact is against you and will not bend to your spin or way of
thinking!

You lie George.

"Truth PLEASE!" <comments@hiv-aids-factorfraud.com> wrote in message
Indeed he does.
HIV does not cause aids as I have told him for years.
faggot behavior causes aids.

On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 14:34:05 -0600, " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net>
wrote:

I knew you belonged in the denialist camp of anonymous shits.

On 4 Jan 2007 10:19:05 -0800, "Truth PLEASE!"
<comments@hiv-aids-factorfraud.com> wrote:

Actually, some 25 million men, women and children died AIDS, the vast
majority of whom did not live a normal lifespan.

"brainfart" <fart@brain.org> schreef in bericht
news:OdSkh.10167$ZT3.9117@newssvr19.news.prodigy.c om...
What makes you think these people are 'leftists'?

Look at who they're attacking - Thabo Mbeki. They are sponsored
by corporate interests...

So why do you think they're leftists?

Alex

On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:14:28 -0000, "Alex"
<avdeelen.REMOFETHIS1@wanadoo.nl> wrote:

I'm a leftist. I believe in healthcare as a right, in universal
access.

Who is sponsored by corporate interests? I'm not. TAC is not. That's a
lie you tell, isn't?

Is Thabo Mbeki a leftist???

So what are you?

George M. Carter

Alex wrote...
Sorry, I tend to generalize, but what I think I meant was that the political
left is heavily involved in the HIV/AIDS advocacy movements, and the rights
of people with HIV are now protected by the same statutes that protect the
rights of other minority groups. The gay activists in San Francisco and
elsewhere are practically communists, and their cause naturally overlaps the
AIDS cause, as well as feminism and other causes that seek to blur the
definition of gender and possibly even species in the name of promoting
equality for all persuns.

The gay advocates are aligned with the HIV advocates and both share the same
goal of remaining alive (animate) long enough to engage in as many anal sex
acts as possible. Since anal sex transmits HIV and stopping that would be
unthinkable as well as impossible, the only practical solution is for science
to discover new drugs that will suppress the virus and allow for more anal
sex acts behind dumpsters.

The San Francisco left also promotes suppression of speech they disagree with,
such as when radical Code Pink feminazi activists decried the BART system's
decision to permit anti-abortion posters in train stations, but BART refused
to remove them because it argued it had no authority to judge which political
viewpoint was correct.

While you are correct in that I have no proof the writer is a leftist, I just
assume that because he/she is trying to suppress the idea that HIV doesn't
cause AIDS, because that belief is not in the interests of the pharmaceutical
companies, and because the interests of the pharmaceutical companies and the
pro-gay and pro-HIV advocates are the same (consuming dozens of expensive
pills a day), I simply assumed the writer was leftist and probably gay and
probably has AIDS too.

"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:tc6rp2tg99o7snh4f5u99f8srfope7qovf@4ax.com...
I deny nothing. faggot behavior causes aids

"brainfart" <fart@brain.org> wrote in message

On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:16:40 -0600, " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net>
wrote:

snip
No, it doesn't. This has been demonstrated to you time and again yet,
like any good look coward bigot-racist-homophobe closet case, you
cling to your bullshit.

That's what denialists do.

Typical. You're utterly predictably pathetic--and I wonder what you're
going to realize as you approach your own death?

George M. Carter

"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message
You have demonstrated nothing. 25 years into the aids disease
yet the straight population is uneffected.

I embrace the truth if that is what you mean.


I don't deny hiv or aids.
That is just another lie you use when all else fails.


taking drugs to prevent me from melting because I could not keep
my dick out of a males shithole either.

Death wrote...
My fucktarded brother was babbling on about how he thought he heard that the
ARVs are forcing the virus to evolve to be less virulent and allowing those
with the virus to live longer even if they receive no drug treatment. He
thought that was some sort of progress, so I rudely explained to him that it
simply meant more time for AIDS patients to infect others before having the
decency to drop dead.

I then descended into a rant about how it wasn't fair that me and other
taxpayers have to pay a million dollars a year to keep him alive just so he
can infect a thousand other people a year, each of whom cost a million dollars
a year to keep alive just so they can each infect a thousand others. He
protested that it "only" costs $30,000 a year to keep AIDS patients alive,
so I asked him how much he earned or paid in taxes (zero dollars a year).
Then he started babbling on about bathhouses and I drove him home and kicked
him out of the car.

My brother is gay and represents a majority, but not all of, the gay men in
the USA. Like most gay American men, he has HIV and uses crystal meth and
is extremely promiscuous. His treatment may "only" cost $30,000 a year, but
it keeps him alive indefinitely and there is no doubt he infects between
several hundred and several thousand others each year. The government
refuses to do anything about it, ignoring the bathhouses and and the meth
sales and use that go on there, and even ignoring the bag of meth that fell
out of my brother's pocket, so there is no chance of locking him up. What
there might be a chance of is reducing U.S. funding HIV/AIDS treatment to
zero, so that without the expensive ARV drugs HIV patients like my brother
will soon begin rotting away and die of AIDS so they can't do more damage.

On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 20:04:32 -0600, " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net>
wrote:

Well, you've demonstrated you can't spell.

And that you're an idiot. A coward. A liar. A bully. A bigot and a
racist.

So this is what I expect of you--and still wonder as you approach your
own death--what will you think about?

Will you realize what a waste of time you've had of it?

George M. Carter

"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message


25 years into the faggot aids and 98% of population is
uninfected and unaffected.

faggot behavior causes aids

On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 21:29:35 -0600, " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net>
wrote:

Made up statistics, I see. In most of the world, the HIV pandemic is
via heterosexual transmission. The fastest rising group in the US is
heterosexual transmission.

It's about vaginal and anal sex. Males who have sex with males are a
vulnerable population, quite true.

You know this--but as usual, repeat the bigotry to satisfy your little
sad itch.

I wonder what you will think about as you draw your last breath and
die? Perhaps how you wasted your life wallowing in ugliness and hate?

George M. Carter

GMCarter wrote...
When we discuss HIV/AIDS we are talking about the USA, because we don't
give a flying fuck about what is happening in Africa. Africa should be
walled off and let the people go extinct and in a century we can go in
and clean up the debris and build shopping malls on it.

As for heterosexual transmission in the USA, has anyone bothered to
study the subgroups accounting for the majority of new cases? I seem
to recall it was the female sex partners of bisexual men who made up
a large percentage, and like the UK we may be seeing a large increase
among African immigrants, while the mainstream, native-born, white,
heterosexual British population accounts for nearly 0% of the new cases.

On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 12:44:35 GMT, brainfart <fart@brain.org> wrote:

I think that's very short sighted. Given the level of discourse on
this forum as too often exemplary of what humans can manage, I think
the best thing would be for the entire species to be eradicated.

I don't think we need to worry much--the extinction is proceeding
apace.

What will you look back on your life and think as you die? Your death
is approaching very rapidly you know.

Is this what you want your life and legacy to reflect? A sad,
pathetic, closet case racist spew?

LOL...so sad, so lame, so pathetic.

George M. Carter