- The BMJ Debate - Or, the Art of Bluffing
- Posted by GMCarter
On Sat, 05 Jun 2004 16:36:50 +1200, Uiopp <uislad@faaa.co.nz> wrote:
snip...
Now I realize you really are just another disingenuous troll! LOL. As
you flit away from logic and data to the next stop on the 'tiny
rounds' of your denialist cant, you swing to the issue of hemophilia.
Citing no less crap from 1995 that has been dealt with time and again.
And yes, again, the science shows that people with Hemophilia who got
infected blood developed AIDS. Those who did not, well, they did not
develop AIDS. Look it up!
Oh! But that might conflict with your carefully constructed psychosis.
So...better yet! Get some HIV and get infected and see what happens.
George M. Carter
- Posted by Uiopp
In article <eq13c018mvfcob5ne3fds6m2g4m7pkrgfh@4ax.com>,
GMCarter <fiar@verizon.net> wrote:
[snip]
People who tell other people to get HIV should not be accusing other
people of being psychotic.
- Posted by Gary Stein
"Uiopp" <uislad@faaa.co.nz> wrote in message
news:uislad-4EFE3F.16365005062004@lust.ihug.co.nz...
And you base the above statement on what evidence? Simply stating that the
interview data on homosexuality is crap is far from showing that all such
data is crap. Now if you said the original Kinsey interview data is crap
most would agree with you (though even that is still a contentious debate
for some in the research community) however that is not what you claim.
Rather you claim that all such data is crap with no attempt on your part to
show that you have even attempted any form of review of the available
interview data on human sexuality.
That you continue to make such claims with no evidentiary backing is even
more amusing......
Gary Stein
- Posted by Gary Stein
"Uiopp" <uislad@faaa.co.nz> wrote in message
news:uislad-73D2B9.00460506062004@lust.ihug.co.nz...
Well it does describe the frustration of people like myself who have been
dealing for over a decade with HIV/AIDS on a personal and community level.
The level of self delusion it takes to deny that there is both an empiric
and theoretical basis for the HIV=AIDS conclusion is simply difficult to
comprehend further more argue with year after year after year. All the while
watching loved ones succumb to this insidious and deadly virus.
Gary Stein
- Posted by GMCarter
On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 00:46:05 +1200, Uiopp <uislad@faaa.co.nz> wrote:
But why should you worry, dear? You insist it is nonexistent or
harmless or something? So a little HIV+ blood won't do a gosh darn
thing, now will it?
George M. Carter
- Posted by Uiopp
In article <hpv5c053imd8n6j8vvo50av57c0pplen9g@4ax.com>,
GMCarter <fiar@verizon.net> wrote:
The word 'dear' is a little queasy-making. I think it's a covert form of
fag-bashing, and I find it very disturbing coming from an openly gay man.
- Posted by Uiopp
In article <wfpwc.3138$po3.2441@nwrddc03.gnilink.net>,
"Gary Stein" <ge.stein@verizon.net> wrote:
Frustration? No doubt. But most people who get frustrated at AIDS don't
deal with that by actually wanting one more person to develop AIDS.
