Australian scientists have shown that the more men masturbate between the
ages of 20 and 50, the less likely they are to develop the disease that
kills more than half a million men each year.

In a survey of 1,079 prostate cancer patients and 1,259 healthy men, Giles
and his team discovered that men who ejaculated more than five times a week
in their 20s were a third less likely to develop an aggressive form of the
disease.

This isn't really new. A while back it was found that men that married
later in life had less prostrate cancer. Men who marry early are unlikely
to masturbate, and are not having sex any five times a week.

"Don Wiss" <donwiss@no_spam.com> wrote:
Had to be an Australian study I suppose! Plenty of data available.

I don't understand the bit about early married men not masturbating.
Never seen any data on that. Could be true, but could be otherwise.
Alternatively, the obsessed frustrated males maybe...

But it probably means the Internet is doing something for male health...
....at least with the younger generation...

T.

"Grant" <grantf@untouchable.net> wrote in message news:<bfekdp$dfm5j$1@ID-
Better explained in:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993942

Don Wiss wrote:
You suggesting that married men are having sex five times a week? From
the complaints I hear, some are lucky to be having it five times a year!
lol

sue

On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 13:56:45 -0400, Grant wrote
(in message <bfekdp$dfm5j$1@ID-135848.news.uni-berlin.de>):

It looks like masturbation is going to be the coming thing!

-- James L. Ryan -- TaliesinSoft

On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 18:26:18 -0700, suzee <suzeeq@nidlink.com> wrote:

Uh, Can you read?

Don <donwiss at panix.com>.

On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 16:58:03 -0400, Don Wiss <donwiss@no_spam.com>
wrote:

What planet do you live on?

Well that's what we didn't actually know

Probably still don't

James L. Ryan <taliesinsoft@mac.com> wrote in message news:<0001HW.BB40D4A4001BF603F0284600@news.earthli nk.net>...
It also makes former US Surgeon General Dr. Joycelyn Elders (1993-94)
look good at last. Remember, back then she courageously advocated
masturbation as an acceptable sexual outlet for teens and forced to
resign (behind the scene of course) by her coward boss who later
masturbated in the Oval office. Well, at least he was consistent
claiming that he didn't have sex with that woman:}

On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 07:17:11 -0700, suzee <suzeeq@nidlink.com> wrote:

So you missed the "lying down cancer"?

There have been reports that showed although Finasteride reduced
overall Prostate Cancer ("PC") rates, in one study it was shown to increase
the more aggressive form. Just one study doesn't prove much, but I have a
theory why it's true - if it is.

The article you posted states that less ejaculation = more cancer.
Finasteride reduces libido.
Reduced libido = less desire to ejaculate.
Less ejaculation = higher rate of aggressive cancer.
Finasteride = cancer.

Solution = even if your libido decreases on Finasteride (or even
Dutasteride), make sure you ejaculate at least 5 times a week regardless.
Go on... now! Have fun.
--
Cheers,

Joshua

Biological age: 30
Mental age: 3



"ada" <ben_nur@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:37621b2e.0307201653.3348348a@posting.google.c om...

"Grant" <grantf@untouchable.net> wrote in message news:<bfekdp$dfm5j$1@ID-135848.news.uni-berlin.de>...



http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...3Dalt.baldspot

"Dr. Zarkov" <Ming@Mongo.com> wrote in message
news:bfjqd7$j7$1@bob.news.rcn.net...
COMMENT

Ah yes. This is the Clinton who, fortunately for him, wasn't
caught when he was trying to inhale that doobee, or
otherwise his political career would have ruined.

This is the Clinton who claimed drug laws saved his
brother's life. But who, of course, didn't want his brother
to have the inconvenience of a criminal conviction drug
record, so presidentially pardoned him. And who forced
Elders out, as you say.

This, the Clinton who allowed several long time military men
to have their careers ruined and pensions wiped out by
courts martial for adultery (still a military crime). But
who saught "forgiveness" from the American people when he,
when head of the armed forces, did the same.

It's actually not the drugs and the adultery that bother me
so much about Clinton as his complete narcissism. His
assumption that the rules should apply to other people,
possibly because other people aren't Rhodes scholars or
governors or special, like he always thought he was. The
complete lack of compassion for people caught in the same
witchhunts that he, as a "new democrat"* helped prosecute.
Rules which he, behind the scenes, flaunted with the best of
them.

*New democrats are like old democrats, except for their
special love of incarcerating young poor men.

Women loved Clinton. God knows why. He wasn't just a good
but weak man. He was a complete hypocritical asshole. Proof
positive that so long as a man can retain his formal social
political standing, women really don't give a flying *&%$
what they are really like. If they have, and retain power,
they're sexy.

Yawk. Yech.

SBH

"mystique" <mystiqueu@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a87a58a7.0307230045.7b78470f@posting.google.c om...

True, that speech was the last straw for her opponents, but she had angered
them even more by previous remarks on the drug (and other) issues. See:

http://search.csmonitor.com/durable/...4/20/p23s3.htm
"..her advocacy of sex education and the distribution of condoms angered
conservatives. Her statement that legalizing drugs should be studied for its
potential to reduce crime angered Clinton. In December 1994, Elders was
asked to resign after making recommendations about sex education that many
found objectionable."

"Dr. Zarkov" <Ming@Mongo.com> wrote in message news:<bflv06$ij6$1@bob.news.rcn.net>...
Whatever the order has been I am glad for Dr. Elders to have witnessed
her weakling spineless former boss admitting that he had phone sex
with Monica and the ‘'orally'' induced masturbation in the Oval Office
that led to his impeachment. After all, how many people are so lucky
to see justice done in their own lifetime let alone in 4 years?

One of the sad outcomes of his presidency is to see that there are
still many people(especially women as Dr. Harris mentioned above) who
continue believe (and even to pay big $ to hear him) such a low
character man capable of lying so readily, skillfully, and at ease on
the spot.

Take care,

D

On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 12:56:44 -0400, "Dr. Zarkov" <Ming@Mongo.com>
wrote:

But isn't there a shortage of sensible persons where you are? There
are here. Elders' suggestion was too politically dangerous, and no
matter what Clinton thought, and he seemed sensible to me, he could do
little else and survive.

On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 19:52:00 -0700, "Steve Harris"
<sbharris@ix.RETICULATEDOBJECTcom.com> wrote:

It always amazes me how Henry Kissinger is so attractive to many
women.

I can see that slick willy might be superficially attractive.

But at least he was an order of magnitude smarter than the present
bear

"Moosh:]" <buggerall@nowt.zilch> wrote in message news:<rbevhv4a35lplkt556un242f2dvu225l2d@4ax.com>. ..
It does not inhibit testosterone. In fact, it raises it slightly. It
inhibits the 5 alpha reductase enzyme that converts testosterone to
DHT (dihydrotestosterone). DHT is thought to be the cause of MPB.

"Grant" <grantf@untouchable.net> wrote in message news:<bfekdp$dfm5j$1@ID-135848.news.uni-berlin.de>...

Then the Internet has probably done more for prostate health than even Hugh Hefner!

Double-A

On 24 Jul 2003 12:46:25 -0700, chuckfrasher@yahoo.com (Chuck) wrote:

I stand corrected, thankyou.

Well my book says it remains "within the normal range"

However, the side effects of finasteride can be similar to
testosterone inhibitors. Impotence, reduced libido, and decreased
sperm production.

5 alpha reductase inhibitor.